Satya Shodhak Samaj Sangh through Its Trustee Member Vishwasrao Bhaskarrao Patil v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Chief Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Batch adjournment order 'paucity of time' - Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, dated 05.03.2025, Coram Mangesh S. Patil & Prafulla S. Khubalkar, JJ.; matters adjourned to dates between 24.03.2025 and 30.06.2025; includes PIL No. 60 of 2024, PIL No. 81 of 2024, PIL No. 88 of 2024, PIL No. 100 of 2018, PIL No. 18 of 2023 and writ petitions of 2019-2025 (e.g., WP 1440/2019, WP 4341/2019, WP 5646/2021, WP 6533/2023, WP 12802/2023 with connected WPs, WP 2794/2025) along with Civil Applications 11090/2023, 11750/2023 and 129/2025; interim relief/undertaking/statement continued till next date except exemption-from-appearance-before-trial-Court orders; purely administrative listing, no ratio, quantum or citation content.
What did the court decide?
No substantive adjudication. The listed matters (PIL No. 18 of 2023, PIL Nos. 60, 81 and 88 of 2024, PIL No. 100 of 2018, and writ petitions ranging from WP No. 1440 of 2019 to WP No. 2794 of 2025, some with associated Civil Applications) are adjourned to scheduled dates between 24.03.2025 and 30.06.2025 due to paucity of time, and interim relief/undertakings/statements in those matters - except this Court's orders granting exemption from appearance before the trial Court - shall continue till the next date.