Clerical correction order rectifying a typographical error in the cause title of an earlier order dated 4 March 2025, where the petitioner's surname was wrongly typed as 'Kharad'; directed to be read as 'Kharade' and treated as part of the earlier order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed JYOTIPRAKASH by JYOTIPRAKASHPAWAR PAWAR Date: 2025.03.27 19:41:39 +0530
JPP NOB. PIl 26.21.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 26 OF 2021 with
INTERIM APPLICATION (St.) NO.7728 OF 2025
Balkrushna Bateshwar Kharade V/s.
…Petitioner/Applicant
Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Mohol, Tal. Mohol, Dist. Solapur and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Yogesh G. Thorat i/b. Ashok B. Tajane for the Petitioner/Applicant
CORAM : ALOK ARADHE, CJ. AND M.S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : 26th MARCH 2025
P.C. :
( M.S. KARNIK, J. ) ( CHIEF JUSTICE )
1/1
Balkrushna Bateshwar Kharade
Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Mohol, Tal. Mohol, Dist. Solapur
Alok Aradhe
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
