Disposed¶9

Swapnil Dilip Patil v. Jhalak Construction Thr Their Partners Naresh Harumal Wadhwani and Anr.

Bombay HC16 Jan 2025IA/568/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court common order dated 14-11-2025, coram Ravindra V. Ghuge & Ashwin D. Bhobe, JJ. Procedural listing/scheduling order only - no adjudication, no named parties, no statute or precedent citations. Interim orders continued subject to removal of office objections within two weeks; conditional dismissal against unserved respondents if spare copies not supplied within 14 days; matters listed 02/12/2025 to 22/01/2026.

What did the court decide?

Administrative listing order: office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders, if any, to continue; affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, to be filed at least one week before the next date; matters listed for hearing on dates from 02/12/2025 to 22/01/2026 per the chart in paragraph 7. ¶9

Swapnil Dilip Patil vs Jhalak Construction Thr Their Partners Naresh Harumal Wadhwani and Anr. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Digitally signed ARUNA by ARUNA SANDEEP SANDEEP TALWALKAR TALWALKAR Date: 2025.11.17 18:42:36 +0530

¶2

.. 1 .. common order

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION/ CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.

¶5

DATE : 14^th NOVEMBER, 2025.

¶6

P.C. :-

¶7

At the time of rising at 5.05 P.M., the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.7 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.

¶8

In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.

¶9

Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.

¶10

¶11

The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed at least one week before the next date.

¶12

Matters in which service of notice is awaited, put up after service.

¶13

Matters in which though notices were issued, the office could not process the notice due to non-supply of spare copies, the Petitioner shall supply spare copies for issuance of Talwalkar

¶14

common order

¶15

notice within 14 days, failing which, the matters in which copies are not supplied, would stand dismissed as against the unserved Respondents on the 15^th day. If copies are supplied, office to issue notice to the unserved Respondents, returnable after four weeks.

¶16

7. Subject to the above, list these matters as under:-

¶17

Serial Nos. of matters on the Board	To be listed on	To be listed in the category
02	02/12/2025	At 3 P.M.
03 to 04	02/12/2025	For Disposal
05	02/12/2025	For Direction
06	02/12/2025	For Dismissal
07 to 11	02/12/2025	Fresh Admission
12 to 17	19/01/2026	Urgent Admission
18 to 40	20/01/2026	Urgent Order
41 to 45	21/01/2026	Urgent Order
48 to 52	22/01/2026	Urgent Order
53	22/01/2026	For Admission
54 to 58	22/01/2026	Due Admission
929	02/12/2025	Urgent Order
931 to 934	02/12/2025	Due Admission

¶18

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )

¶19

Talwalkar

Swapnil Dilip Patil v. Jhalak Construction Thr Their Partners Naresh Harumal Wadhwani and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Swapnil Dilip Patil v. Jhalak Construction Thr Their Partners Naresh Harumal Wadhwani and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Jairam Damji Hingu vs the State of Maharashtra

Ashraj Developers Pvt. Ltd. Thr Auth Rep Jash Ashesh Shah vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Jayant Krishnarao Naik vs Thane Municipal Corporation and Ors.

P. Builders and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra and 5 Ors.

C C Ali Alias Chempur Puthan Peedka Yil Chekuty Ali vs Mcgm G North Ward

Kannamwar Nagar Adishakti Cooperative Housing Society Limited vs State of Maharashtra through Department