Mohammad Hanif Mohammad Iqbal Bakshi v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: anticipatory bail; Bombay High Court; Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction; intervention/impleadment of First Informant as Respondent No.2; Interim Application No.5243 of 2024; Anticipatory Bail Application No.1053 of 2024; Tabrez Ajim Shaikh; Mohammad Hanif Mohammad Iqbal Bakshi; State of Maharashtra; Rajesh S. Patil, J.; ad-interim relief continued; adjourned to 12 February 2025. Purely interlocutory order granting an intervenor's impleadment request; contains no ruling on the merits of the anticipatory bail application, no statutory interpretation, and no citation of precedent.
What did the court decide?
Interim Application No.5243 of 2024 allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and disposed of: the Intervenor (First Informant, Mohammad Hanif Mohammad Iqbal Bakshi) added as Party Respondent No.2 in Criminal Anticipatory Bail Application No.1053 of 2024, amendment to be carried out within one week. Anticipatory Bail Application No.1053 of 2024 adjourned (stood over) to 12 February 2025, with ad-interim relief granted earlier continuing till the next date of hearing.