Mohammad Hanif Mohammad Iqbal Bakshi v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail applications could not be taken up due to paucity of time; the matters were adjourned to the next date and any interim relief already granted was directed to continue until then.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1053 OF 2024
Tabrez Ajim Shaikh ....APPLICANT V/S
State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
WITH
CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 5243 OF 2024
In
Cr. Anticipatory Bail Appln. 1053 OF 2024
Mohammad Hanif Mohammad Iqbal Bakshi ....PETITIONER V/S
The State Of Maharashtra And Anr
....RESPONDENT
To be listed a/w I.A.NO.5243/2024 for Respondent
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Tabrez Ajim Shaikh
- respondent
State Of Maharashtra
- petitioner
Mohammad Hanif Mohammad Iqbal Bakshi
- respondent
The State Of Maharashtra And Anr
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court