Chandrakant Jalindar Honmane v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail, Bombay High Court; intervenor/informant impleaded as respondent in ABA No. 3022 of 2024 via Interim Application No. 4731 of 2024; allowed in terms of prayer clause (a); amendment forthwith; IA disposed; ABA adjourned to 12 February 2025 with ad-interim relief continued. Coram: Rajesh S. Patil, J. Advocates: Jenish D. Jain for applicant Shrimant Sadashiv Thorat; Niranjan Mundargi with Satyam H. Nimbalkar i/b Abhishek U. Arote for intervenor Chandrakant Jalindar Honmane; Rutuja Ambekar, APP for State. Procedural order only - no ratio on bail merits; no statutes or precedents cited.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to the Informant to be added as a Respondent in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 3022 of 2024; Interim Application No. 4731 of 2024 allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and disposed of, with amendment to be carried out forthwith; the Anticipatory Bail Application itself stood over to 12 February 2025 with ad-interim relief granted earlier continued till the next date of hearing. No decision on the merits of anticipatory bail.