Shailendra Mohan Kamath and Anr. vs Yash Builders and Anr. and Gaurav v. Savla and 11 (Proposed Res)

for the Municipal Corporation and tenders across the bar a statement of property taxes payable in respect of the property in question. Mr. Giri submits that the property tax outstanding with penalty as on 12^th September, 2025 is Rs. 28,54,816/-. Mr. Giri further submits that the

¶42

future bill for the period 1^st April, 2025 to 31^st March, 2026 for Rs. 49,38,277/- has also been furnished, although as on 12^th September, 2025 Rs, 28,54,816/- is outstanding.

¶43

Mr. Bhise, learned Counsel appearing for the Judgment Debtor seeks to tender across the bar a limited affidavit in reply in compliance with the order dated 5^th August, 2025, where it is stated by Mr. Paras Dedhia that he is ready and willing to make payments towards the property taxes.

¶44

Nikita Gadgil 2/5

¶45

IA 1977-24 in EXA 1619-25 @ connected matters.doc

¶46

Let Mr. Dedhia consider the outstanding amount of property taxes of Rs. 28,54,816/- and let this Court know within a period of two weeks with copy to the others, under an affidavit as to when the property taxes would be paid stating the timeline for the payment of the said property taxes. Since the bill for the period 1^st April, 2025 to 31^st March, 2026 is not yet due the same will be considered later on.

¶47

Mr. Bhise points out that the Respondent No. 3 has passed away. Let appropriate steps be taken in this regard.

¶48

This Court is informed that Mr. Paras Dedhia is present in the Court. Let him remain present in the Court on the next date as well.

¶49

Interim Application No. 1977 of 2024

¶50

Is is observed that the Respondents No.8 and 9 have filed reply.

¶51

Let the other Respondents including the Judgment Debtor file reply to the Interim Application within a period of two weeks with copy to the others. Rejoinder in two weeks thereafter with copy to the others.

¶52

Nikita Gadgil

¶53

IA 1977-24 in EXA 1619-25 @ connected matters.doc

¶54

Mr. Rathod submits that since it has been recorded in the order dated 5^th August, 2025, based on the affidavit filed on behalf of the IIFL Home Finance Limited, that the original title deed with respect to the Flat No. 2703 had been handed over / released to Mrs. Kashmira Dedhia, wife of Mr. Paras Dedhia, the Judgment Debtor, in order to preserve the said security from being alienated, this Court may direct the Judgment Debtor / his wife to deposit the title deed with the Prothonotary & Senior Master of this Court.

¶55

Mr. Bhise submits, on instructions, that the said Flat No. 2703

¶56

has already been sold and it would, therefore, not be possible to deposit the title deeds.

¶57

Let appropriate instructions be taken by the Applicant on this development. List on 3^rd November, 2025.

¶58

Let Mr. Paras Dedhia also remain present in the Court on the next date.

¶59

Interim Application (L) 29021 of 2025

¶60

None appears for the Applicant in this Interim Application.

¶61

Nikita Gadgil 4/5

¶62

IA 1977-24 in EXA 1619-25 @ connected matters.doc

¶63

Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents submit that this Interim Application has not been served upon them.

¶64

It is observed that the Interim Application is on lodging number. Let objections be removed and registered number be obtained within a period of three weeks, failing which, the Interim Application to stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.

¶65

Subject to the above, list on 3^rd November, 2025.

¶66

(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)

¶67

Digitally signed by NIKITA NIKITA YOGESH YOGESH GADGIL GADGIL Date: 2025.09.24 19:29:26 +0530

¶68

Nikita Gadgil 5/5

Shailendra Mohan Kamath and Anr. v. Yash Builders and Anr. and Gaurav v Savla and 11 (Proposed Res)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shailendra Mohan Kamath and Anr. v. Yash Builders and Anr. and Gaurav v Savla and 11 (Proposed Res)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. vs Abhishek Ramesh Vyas and Anr.

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited vs Shalibhadra Traders Th. Its Prop. Reena Ravindra Khona

Bal Asha Trust vs Lahu Bhau Sonawane

Aruna Mohan Kamath (Since Deceased vs Messers Yash Builders

Navin Mittal vs Anupam Mittal and Ors.

Anuj Bajaj vs Cogoport Pvt. Ltd.