Anuj Bajaj vs Cogoport Pvt. Ltd.

Mr. Pratik Saksaria, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vedant Choudhary, Mr. Pratik and Mr. Shivam Laturiya i/b Shivam Laturiya for the Applicant. Mr. Simil Purohit, Senior Advocate with Mr. Farah Khan and Mr. Amar Parab i/b Kalpesh Joshi Associates and Mr. Swapnil Khatri for the Respondent No.1.

¶11

Mr. Harshwardhan Melanta i/b M/s K. Ashar & Co. for the Respondent no. 2-HDFC Bank.

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

Interim Application No. 3316 of 2025

¶14

This Interim Application filed by the Creditors seeks direction

¶15

against the Judgment Debtor to discharge the debt of the Respondent No.3 in the bank account held with the Respondent No.2 being account

¶16

no. 50200023245253 and to release the encumbrance created on the

¶17

Nikita Gadgil 1/3

¶18

IA 3316-25 in COMEXL 37098-24 @ connected matters.doc

¶19

two immovable properties viz. House No. 4910, DLF Phase IV, Gurugram, Haryana-122002 and Flat No. 604, 6^th Floor, Tower No. T-5, Park View Residency, Gurugram, Haryana-122017 vide Deed of Mortgage dated 16^th October, 2020 in terms of the award.

¶20

Mr. Saksaria, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Applicant submits that the prayer Clauses (b) and (e) have been granted earlier and in terms thereof disclosure affidavits have also been filed.

¶21

Mr. Saksaria, learned Senior Counsel submits that main reason for circulating this Application and pressing for prayer Clause (a) is that the HDFC bank in pursuance of Notice under Section 13(2) of the The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 (“SARFAESI Act”) is in the process of taking steps to take physical possession of the two residential properties, which are occupied by the Judgment Creditors along with their family members including their elderly parents who are 79 and 78 years aged.

¶22

Mr. Saksaria has submitted that there is no stay to the execution of the award dated 21^st July, 2024, which directs the Judgment Debtors

¶23

Nikita Gadgil 2/3

¶24

IA 3316-25 in COMEXL 37098-24 @ connected matters.doc

¶25

to make payments to the Judgment Creditors which as on date amount

¶26

to Rs. 44,74,02,661/- along with interest.

¶27

Mr. Saksaria concluded his arguments in support of the Interim Application.

¶28

Mr. Purohit, learned Senior Counsel seeks some accommodation

¶29

in the matter and requests that the matter be listed tomorrow.

¶30

Since tomorrow this Court has almost 50 matters on board out of which there are 3 fixed matters, it would not be possible to accept Mr. Purohit’s request.

¶31

However, learned Senior Counsel appearing in the matter have requested for 29^th July, 2025.

¶32

Accordingly, list on 29^th July, 2025 on the Supplementary Board.

¶33

Digitally signed by NIKITA NIKITAYOGESH YOGESH GADGIL GADGIL Date:2025.07.17 18:56:46 +0530

¶34

(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)

¶35

Nikita Gadgil 3/3

Anuj Bajaj v. Cogoport Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

Anuj Bajaj v. Cogoport Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shilpi Constructions Proprietor Mr Gaddigaiah R Kurudimath vs M S Chartered Hotels Pvt. Ltd.

Tata Capital Limited(Formerly Known as Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd) vs Ganesh Dhanegave

Tata Capital Limited (Formerly Known as Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd.) vs Jayrambhai Ravabhai Rabari and Anr. (Borrower)

Pramod Makharia vs Laxmidevi Makharia and 2 Others

Prime Developers and Anr. vs Mayank Jaswantlal Shah

Minaxi Satra vs Mayank Jaswantilal Shah