Surbhi Niwas Co-Operative Housing Society v. Tanzimul Muslimin Society Sanpada
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, order dated 13-03-2025 in Interim Applications Nos. 14564 and 14562 of 2024 in Writ Petition No. 8795 of 2024 (Tanzimul Muslimin Society Sanpada v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.), Coram Gadkari and Khata JJ. Intervention allowed: Surbhi Niwas Co-Operative Housing Society and Akhil Sanpada Sanskrutik Pratisthan held necessary parties for final adjudication; both IAs allowed in terms of prayer clause (a); amendment of petition within two weeks; notice to Respondent No.6 returnable 3rd April 2025; notices waived for Respondent Nos.1-4 (AGP Tanu N. Bhatia), Respondent No.5 (Trushna Shah/Tejesh Dande), and newly added Respondent Nos.7 and 8 (R.D. Soni; Sujay Gawade). Petitioner's counsel: Sagheer A. Khan. No statutes or precedents discussed.
What did the court decide?
Both Interim Applications (Nos. 14564 and 14562 of 2024) allowed in terms of prayer clause (a): the Applicants/Intervenors joined as necessary parties; Petitioner directed to amend the Petition within two weeks; notice to Respondent No.6 returnable on 3rd April, 2025; notices waived on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 to 4 (learned AGP), Respondent No.5, and newly added Respondent Nos.7 and 8 (by Mr. Soni and Mr. Gawade respectively).