Disposed¶5

Rajeev Manmohan Gupta v. Brijwasi Builders

Bombay HC12 Dec 2025CARBP/15/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 37 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 appeal; COMM. ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 15 OF 2025; High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Commercial Division; Somasekhar Sundaresan J.; order dated July 3, 2025; Rajeev Manmohan Gupta (petitioner; Rohaan Cama i/b Manoj G. Agre) v. Brijwasi Builders & Ors. (respondents; Naresh Jain a/w Neha Anchlia for Respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4; Piyush M. Shah a/w Dishang Shah, Manisha Jain, Shreya Modi for Respondent No. 2); hearing adjourned to July 18, 2025 for 'Final Hearing- Section 37' on Main Board; 15-minute oral argument limit per side by consent; five-page Note on Submissions with page and case law references; agreed common compilation to be filed.

What the court decided

Rajeev Manmohan Gupta vs Brijwasi Builders — Arbitration | Bombay HC (2025)

¶1

528-CARBP-15-2025 copy.docx

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION

¶3

Digitally signed by SHRADDHA SHRADDHA KAMLESH KAMLESH TALEKAR TALEKAR Date: 2025.07.15 21:18:36 +0530

¶4

COMM. ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 15 OF 2025

¶5

Rajeev Manmohan Gupta Vs Brijwasi Builders & Ors.

¶6

.. Petitioner

¶7

. Respondent(s)

¶8

Mr. Rohaan Cama i/b Mr. Manoj G. Agre, for Petitioner.

¶9

Mr. Naresh Jain a/w. Ms. Neha Anchlia, for Respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4. Mr. Piyush M. Shah a/w. Dishang Shah, Manisha Jain, Shreya Modi, for Respondent No. 2.

¶10

CORAM : SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.

¶11

Date : July 3, 2025

¶12

Order :

¶13

This is a Petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“ the Act ”).

¶14

Heard Learned Counsel for the parties for an overview of the matter. Based on the nature of the issues involved and bearing in mind the scope of jurisdiction under Section 37 of the Act, Learned Counsel have graciously agreed that the Petitioner shall take not more than 15 minutes and the Respondents shall take no longer than 15 minutes for verbal arguments in the matter.

¶15

Page 1 of 2 July 3, 2025

¶16

Shraddha

¶17

528-CARBP-15-2025 copy.docx

¶18

Towards this end, the parties shall file e-file a short Note on Submissions, not exceeding five pages, along with page and case law references, setting out the manner in which the points canvassed by them ought to be accepted by this Court.

¶19

It is made clear that the time commitments made above shall bind the parties, and such time shall be utilized at the discretion of the Counsel for verbalizing the pivotal submissions, resting assured that the rest of their contentions from their Note on Submissions, would be dealt with by the Court.

¶20

With the aforesaid commitments, parties shall file an agreed common compilation before the next date. Stand over to July 18, 2025 , for “Final Hearing- Section 37”, on Main Board .

¶21

All actions required to be taken pursuant to this order, shall be taken upon receipt of a downloaded copy as available on this Court’s website.

¶22

[ SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.]

¶23

Page 2 of 2 July 3, 2025

¶24

Shraddha

Rajeev Manmohan Gupta v. Brijwasi Builders

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Rajeev Manmohan Gupta v. Brijwasi Builders

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Chaitanya Pramod Talwalkar vs Sandeep Shubaker Talwar

Pashmina Realty Private Limited vs Ekta Housing Private Limited

B R Gandhi and Associates vs Laxmichand Kenia

Mohammed Ali M. Sali, Since Deceased, vs Rajaram Chavan Real Estate Private Limited

M/S. Garg Enterprises Engineers and Contractors Thr. Mr.Atul Kumar Garg Partner vs Konkan Railway Corporation Limited Thr.Its Chairman and Manging Dir. and Another

Azul Denimkart LLP vs Shree Ram Textiles