Tata Motors Finance Limited v. Dhirubhai Dahima
Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 – S.11 – appointment of arbitrator
Case brief
What is this about?
Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996; appointment of arbitrator; existence of arbitration agreement; Clause 21; Agreement dated 31 March 2022; Section 11(6A) limited scope of review; Section 16 existential substance to arbitral tribunal; In Re: Interplay (2024) 6 SCC 1 seven-judge bench; SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Krish Spinning 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1754; Ajay Madhusudan Patel v. Jyotrindra S. Patel 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2597; arbitration notice 27 September 2024 unanswered; ex parte; affidavit of service 10 February 2025; Mumbai Centre for International Arbitration (MCIA) institutional rules; sole arbitrator; disclosure under Section 11(8) read with Section 12(1); costs borne equally; merits kept open; Tata Motors Finance Limited v. Dhirubhai Dahima & Anr.; Bombay High Court; Somasekhar Sundaresan J; 13-03-2025; CARAP 69 of 2025 (doc ref 527.CARAP.69.2025).
What did the court decide?
Section 11 Application disposed of by referring the disputes and differences under the Agreement dated March 31, 2022 to arbitration: the Mumbai Centre for International Arbitration (MCIA) to appoint an appropriate arbitrator (Sole Arbitrator) and administer the arbitration in terms of its Institutional Arbitration Rules; Applicant's advocates to communicate the order to MCIA within one week of upload and provide parties' contact particulars; Learned Sole Arbitrator to forward statutory disclosure under Section 11(8) read with Section 12(1) for filing in the Registry; parties to appear before the Sole Arbitrator as directed; arbitral/Tribunal costs and fees to be borne equally by the parties in the first instance, subject to any final Award on costs; all merits issues expressly kept open.