Saryu Dhirajlal Mayani and Anr. Partners of Manoj and Co. vs Manoj and Co. and 4 Ors.

to bring on record one of the Respondents, are allowed. Liberty to carry out the changes in front of the Associate. Re-verification is dispensed with.

¶21

It is made clear that the reference to arbitration is as if the Applications have already been amended.

¶22

Despite the Arbitration Application No.232 of 2024 not having an interim application for making the same amendments, since the Respondents have no quarrel with the amendment being allowed in the same manner as done in the other application, the same substitution by way of bringing on record legal heirs is deemed to apply to the reference made under Arbitration Application No. 232 of 2024 as well.

¶23

Both the captioned Applications have been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ( “the Act” ), seeking appointment of an arbitrator in connection with disputes and differences that are said to have arisen between the parties under an Partnership Deed dated April 1, 1978 (“ Agreement ”). The arbitration agreement is contained in Clause 17 (Found at Page No. 32 of the Application) of the Agreement. In the interest of brevity, the arbitration agreement is not being extracted here. Suffice it to say that this matter falls within the jurisdiction of this Court.

¶24

Page 2 of 4 JULY 17, 2025

¶25

Aarti Palkar

¶26

31.CARAP.80.2024.doc

¶27

Learned Counsel for the Respondents has no quarrel to proceed to the arbitration forthwith, particularly since the very same parties are already engaged in arbitration before the Learned Sole Arbitrator.

¶28

In these circumstances, both these proceedings are hereby finally disposedof , appointing the very same arbitrator in the following terms:

¶29

A] Mr. Firoz Bharucha, an advocate of this Court is hereby appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes and differences between the parties arising out of and in connection with the Agreement referred to above;

¶30

Office Address :- 201, Savla Chambers, 40, Cawasji Patel Street, Mumbai – 400 001

¶31

Email :- [email protected]

¶32

B] A copy of this Order will be communicated to the Learned Sole Arbitrator by the Advocates for the Applicant within a period of one week from the date of upload of this order. The Applicant shall provide the contact and communication particulars of the parties to the Arbitral Tribunal along with a copy of this Order;

¶33

C] The Learned Sole Arbitrator is requested to forward the statutory Statement of Disclosure under Section 11(8) read with Section 12(1) of the Act to the parties within a period of two weeks from receipt of a copy of this Order;

¶34

D] The parties shall appear before the Learned Sole Arbitrator on such date and at such place as indicated, to

Page 3 of 4

JULY 17, 2025

Aarti Palkar

31.CARAP.80.2024.doc

obtain appropriate directions with regard to conduct of the arbitration including fixing a schedule for pleadings, examination of witnesses, if any, schedule of hearings etc. At such meeting, the parties shall provide a valid and functional email address along with mobile and landline numbers of the respective Advocates of the parties to the Arbitral Tribunal. Communications to such email addresses shall constitute valid service of correspondence in connection with the arbitration;

¶40

E] All arbitral costs and fees of the Arbitral Tribunal shall be borne by the parties equally in the first instance, and shall be subject to any final Award that may be passed by the Tribunal in relation to costs.

¶41

Needless to say, nothing contained in this order is an expression of an opinion on merits of the matter or the relative strength of the parties. All issues on merits are expressly kept open to be agitated before the arbitral tribunal appointed hereby.

¶42

All actions required to be taken pursuant to this order shall be taken upon receipt of a downloaded copy as available on this Court’s website.

¶43

[ SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.]

¶44

Page 4 of 4 JULY 17, 2025

¶45

Aarti Palkar

Saryu Dhirajlal Mayani and Anr. Partners of Manoj and Co. v. Manoj and Co. and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saryu Dhirajlal Mayani and Anr. Partners of Manoj and Co. v. Manoj and Co. and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Pant Nagar Ashwamegh Co-Operative Housing Soc Ltd. vs Kavya Construction Company(Formerly Known as Akruti Constructions Company)

Kumkang Kind India Pvt. Ltd. vs Reliance Astaldi Jv

Juhu Tara Co. Operative Housing Society Limited vs Shree Sai Sagar Consultants

M/S Sagar Automobiles vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

Tata Aia Lif Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Sejal Harshadrai Parekh

Jeev Urja Pvt. Ltd. vs Abhyudaya Co. op Bank Ltd.