Madhukar Dula Patil vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Mr. A. B. Pawar, Advocate for the Petitioners in WP No. 15565/2023, 15712/2023, 15173/2023, 17752/2023 Mr. K. B. Jadhav, Advocate for the Petitioner in WP No. 5077/2025 Mr. N. D. Sonawane, Advocate for the Respondent Mr. S. V. Dixit, Advocate for the Petitioner in WP No. 9733/2023 Mr. A. G. Talhar, Advocate for the Applicant in CA Nos. 11440/2023, 11441/2023, WP No. 5620/2023

¶79

Mr. D. R. Korade, AGP for the Respondent/State

¶80

CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 11^th DECEMBER, 2025

¶81

P. C. :-

¶82

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner.

¶83

Mr. Talhar, learned counsel points out that the order dated 15.05.2023 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, under the Maharashtra Money Lenders (Regulation) Act in Appeal No.37/2022, whereby application filed by petitioners came to be rejected and thereby confirming the order dated 24.11.2022 passed by District Deputy Registrar (Money Lenders), Jalgaon.

¶84

Mr. Korade, learned AGP raises preliminary objection to the maintainability of the petition by pointing out that, against the

¶85

4 of 6

¶86

912 CA 2838.2025.odt

¶87

order passed by Divisional Joint Registrar, the Petitioner has an alternate and efficacious remedy by filing a revision under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Money-Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014 before the Registrar of Money Lending, Maharashtra State, Pune.

¶88

In view of that, petitions are disposed of as not maintainable.

¶89

The Petitioner is at liberty to file the revision before the Registrar of Money Lending, Maharashtra State, Pune within a period of six weeks from today.

¶90

The delay incurred on account of prosecuting the present petition shall be duly considered by the authority while considering an application for condonation of delay.

¶91