Nitin Nandkumar Patil and Another v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary, Mumbai and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Maintainability of writ petition; alternate and efficacious remedy; revision under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Money-Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014; Registrar of Money Lending Maharashtra State Pune; Divisional Joint Registrar Cooperative Societies; District Deputy Registrar (Money Lenders) Jalgaon; Appeal No. 37/2022; Maharashtra Money Lenders (Regulation) Act; money lending licence/regulation; preliminary objection by AGP; petitions disposed of as not maintainable; liberty to file revision within six weeks; condonation of delay to be considered; interim relief to continue until revisional authority decides; status-quo till revision decided; revision to be decided within six months; all points kept open; Aurangabad Bench; Siddheshwar S. Thombre, J.; 2025:BHC-AUG:35049.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to file revision before the Registrar of Money Lending, Maharashtra State, Pune within a period of six weeks; delay incurred in prosecuting the present petitions to be duly considered by the authority while considering condonation of delay; interim relief to continue in operation until the revisional authority decides the matter on its own merits; parties to maintain status-quo till the revision is decided; Registrar of Money Lending, Maharashtra State, Pune to decide the proceedings within six months; all points kept open; pending civil applications disposed of.