Disposed¶15

Shahid Siraj Qureshi v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC10 Jan 2025BA/5402/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court common order dated 23.06.2025 (Ashwin D. Bhobe, J.), Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction: hearing deferred for paucity of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks; interim/ad-interim orders continued; replies/rejoinders before next date; matters listed for admission between 02.09.2025 and 08.09.2025. Purely procedural listing order - no parties, statutes, precedents, issues or merits holdings recorded.

What did the court decide?

Administrative directions only: office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders, if any, to continue subject to compliance; affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, to be filed before the next date; matters listed for Admission on dates from 2/9/2025 to 8/9/2025 as per the chart. ¶15

Shahid Siraj Qureshi vs the State of Maharashtra — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

NIKITA KAILAS DARADE Digitally signed byNIKITA KAILASDARADEDate: 2025.06.2510:46:15 +0530

¶2

Nikita .. 1 .. COMMON ORDER

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

¶5

DATE :- 23^rd JUNE, 2025

¶6

Per Court :-

¶7

At the time of rising at 6.35 pm the matters mentioned in the

¶8

chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.

¶9

In several of these matters, there are office objections. As

¶10

such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.

¶11

Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order,

¶12

if any granted earlier, would continue.

¶13

The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed

¶14

before the next date.

¶15

Subject to the above, list these matters as under:-

¶16

Serial Nos. of matters on the Board	To be listed on	To be listed in the category
36 to 52	2/9/2025	For Admission
54 to 60	3/9/2025	For Admission
62 to 69	4/9/2025	For Admission
71 to 85(except 73 and 82)	4/9/2025	For Admission
87 to 101	8/9/2025	For Admission
103 to 115(except 112)	8/9/2025	For Admission
117 to 119	8/9/2025	For admission

¶17

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)

Shahid Siraj Qureshi v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shahid Siraj Qureshi v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Santosh Dhondiram Dhemare vs the State of Maharashtra

Akash @ Bhaiyya Manik Jadhav vs State of Maharashtra

B Sunil Kumar Dora vs Union of India and Anr.

Arjun @ Pandit Raju Salunkhe vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Vishwas @ Ghanshyam Nivrutti Koli vs State of Maharashtra

Suresh Balu @ Yashwant Pawar vs State of Maharashtra