Disposed¶7

Santosh Dhondiram Dhemare v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC25 Apr 2025BA/3620/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interchange/correction of bail orders; Bombay High Court, Ashwin D. Bhobe, J., 23.06.2025; Crl. BA 3620/2024 (Santosh Dhondiram Dhemare) and Crl. BA 3950/2024 (Akash @ Bhaiyya Manik Jadhav); orders dated 12.06.2025 found swapped; Office directed to correct and upload; BA 3620/2024 clarified disposed per 12.06.2025 order; BA 3950/2024 stood over to 26.06.2025.

What did the court decide?

Correction of interchanged orders directed: order dated 12th June, 2025 in Crl. BA 3620/2024 to be shown as the order in Crl. BA 3950/2024 and vice versa; corrected order to be uploaded; Crl. BA 3620/2024 clarified as disposed of in terms of the order dated 12th June, 2025; Crl. BA 3950/2024 stood over to 26th June, 2025. ¶7

Santosh Dhondiram Dhemare vs the State of Maharashtra — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶7

Issue for consideration

Whether the orders dated 12th June, 2025 passed in Bail Application No. 3620 of 2024 and Bail Application No. 3950 of 2024 were interchanged by mistake and require correction. +1 more

¶3

Court's answer

Perusal of the orders dated 12th June, 2025 in Bail Application No. 3620 of 2024 and Bail Application No. 3950 of 2024 confirms a mistake - the two orders stand interchanged.

¶3

Ratio / Principle

The Court accepted counsel's statement that the order dated 12th June, 2025 passed in Bail Application No. 3950 of 2024 is the order to be reflected in Criminal Bail Application No. 3620 of 2024, and vice versa.

¶4

Key takeaways

Office directed to carry out corrections by showing the order dated 12th June, 2025 passed in Criminal Bail Application No. 3620 of 2024 as the order in Criminal Bail Application No. 3950 of 2024, and vice versa.ratio¶5
Corrected order to be uploaded.ratio¶6
Clarified that Criminal Bail Application No. 3620 of 2024 stands disposed of in terms of the order dated 12th June, 2025.ratio

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bombay High Court (Ashwin D. Bhobe, J.), 23 June 2025 - ministerial correction order. Finding on perusal that the orders dated 12th June, 2025 passed in Criminal Bail Application No. 3620 of 2024 (Santosh Dhondiram Dhemare) and Criminal Bail Application No. 3950 of 2024 (Akash @ Bhaiyya Manik Jadhav) had been interchanged, the Court accepted counsel's statement identifying which order belonged to which matter, directed the Office to show the order dated 12th June, 2025 passed in Crl. BA 3620/2024 as the order in Crl. BA 3950/2024 and vice versa, and to upload the corrected order. The Court further clarified that Crl. BA 3620/2024 stands disposed of in terms of the order dated 12th June, 2025, while Crl. BA 3950/2024 stood over to 26th June, 2025. No merits adjudication; no statute or precedent engaged.

¶1

Digitally signed ARUNASANDEEP by ARUNASANDEEPTALWALKAR TALWALKAR Date: 2025.06.23 20:08:02 +0530 501.502.BA3620.2024.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

(Sr. No. 501) CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3620 OF 2024

¶4

Santosh Dhondiram Dhemare. ... Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent.

¶5

WITH

¶6

(Sr. No. 502) CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3950 OF 2024

¶7

Akash @ Bhaiyya Manik Jadhav. ... Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent.

¶8

Mr. Aniket Nikam, Advocate for Applicant in BA/3620/2024.

¶9

Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for Respondent/State in BA/3620/2024.

¶10

Mr. Aniket Nikam, i/b. Mr. Amit Icham, Advocate for Applicant in BA/3950/2024.

¶11

Ms.M.H. Mhatre, APP for Respondent/State in BA/3950/2024.

¶12

¶13

CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 23^th JUNE, 2025.

¶14

P.C. :

¶15

Not on board. Upon production taken on board.

¶16

These matters are circulated today on the ground that the

¶17

order passed in Bail Application No. 3620 of 2024 was

¶18

¶19

Talwalkar

¶20

501.502.BA3620.2024.odt

¶21

interchanged with Bail Application No. 3950 of 2024.

¶22

Perusal of the order dated 12^th June, 2025 passed in Bail Application No. 3620 of 2024 and Bail Application No. 3950 of 2024, indeed reflects a mistake as stated by Mr. Nikam, learned Advocate for the Applicants in both the matter.

¶23

Mr. Nikam, learned Advocate for the Applicant states that the order dated 12^th June, 2025 passed in Bail Application No. 3950 of 2024 is an order which is required to be reflected in Criminal Bail Application No. 3620 of 2024. He further states that the order dated 12^th June, 2025 passed in Criminal Bail Application No. 3620 of 2024 is the order which is required to be reflected in Criminal Bail Application No. 3950 of 2024. Statement made by Mr. Nikam, learned Advocate for the Applicant is accepted.

¶24

Office to carry out corrections by showing the order dated 12^th June, 2025 passed in Criminal Bail Application No. 3620 of 2024 as the order in Criminal Bail Application No. 3950 of 2024

and vice-versa.

Talwalkar

501.502.BA3620.2024.odt

¶29

Corrected order be uploaded.

¶30

It is clarified that Criminal Bail Application No. 3620 of 2024 stands disposed of in terms of the order dated 12^th June, 2025, whereas the Criminal Bail Application No. 3950 of 2024 is stood over to 26^th June, 2025.

¶31

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)

¶32

¶33

Talwalkar

Santosh Dhondiram Dhemare v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Dhondiram Dhemare v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Dhiraj Ratan Vairagar vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Dattatray Dadu Patil vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Shubham @ Banti Laxman Kamble vs State of Maharashtra

Sagar Bharat Giri vs the State of Maharashtra

Zuby Ifeanyi Udoka vs State of Maharashtra

Bhushan Sanjay Edake vs the State of Maharashtra