Disposed¶6

Mukesh Laxman Gholap v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC5 Mar 2025BA/5285/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of bail application with liberty; fresh bail application before Trial Court on change in circumstances; Crime No. 1367 of 2019, Chakan Police Station, District Pune; Sections 75, 302 IPC; Sections 4(25)(27) Arms Act; earlier Criminal Bail Application No. 1197 of 2022 withdrawn (order dated 15.09.2023); Bombay High Court; Ashwin D. Bhobe, J.; decided 25 August 2025; disposed of, no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to withdraw the Bail Application and to file a fresh bail application before the Trial Court on the ground of change in circumstances; any such application to be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law. ¶6

Mukesh Laxman Gholap vs State of Maharashtra — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

21-BA-5285-2024.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 5285 OF 2024

¶5

Mukesh Laxman Gholap ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent

¶6

¶7

Mr. Aniket Nikam a/w Sumit Patil, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. Manisha Tidke, APP for Respondent/State.

¶8

¶9

CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 25^th AUGUST, 2025.

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

Mr. Aniket Nikam, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Ms. Manisha Tidke, learned APP for the State.

¶12

By the present Application, Applicant is seeking bail in Crime No. 1367 of 2019 registered with Chakan Police Station, District Pune for the offences punishable under Sections 75, 302 of Indian Penal Code (for short “IPC”) and Sections 4(25)(27) of Arms Act.

¶13

Ms. Manisha Tidke, learned APP for the State points out to the order dated 15^th September, 2023 passed in Criminal Bail Application No.1197 of 2022 and submits that the earlier Bail Application was withdrawn. She submits that in the event in the change in circumstance, the Applicant would have to move trial court with a fresh Bail Application, at the first instance.

Gayatri Shimpi

21-BA-5285-2024.doc

In view of the objection raised by Ms. Manisha Tidke learned APP for the State, Mr. Aniket Nikam on instructions from the Applicant craves leave to withdraw the present Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh bail Application before the Trial Court on the ground of change in circumstances. Request made by Mr. Aniket Nikam not objected to by Ms. Manisha Tidke, learned APP for the State.

¶18

In view of the above, leave granted to withdraw the present Bail Application with liberty as prayed. If such Application is filed the same shall be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law.

¶19

Bail Application No. 5285 of 2024 is disposed of with the liberty as prayed for.

¶20

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)

¶21

Digitally signed GAYATRIRAJENDRASHIMPI by GAYATRIRAJENDRASHIMPIDate:2025.08.26 17:08:46 +0530

¶22

¶23

Gayatri Shimpi

Mukesh Laxman Gholap v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Laxman Gholap v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Hitesh Kamlesh Gautam vs State of Maharashtra

Saurabh Makardhwaj Mane vs the State of Maharashtra

Manoj @ Bhaiji Bibhishan Surerao vs State of Maharashtra

Omkar @ Bhaiya Anil Kolpe vs State of Maharashtra

Dattatray Dadu Patil vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Santosh Tuljaram Parse vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.