Santosh Tuljaram Parse v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court common order, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, Judge Ashwin D. Bhobe, dated 13 June 2025; batch of criminal appellate matters deferred as hearing could not be taken up for paucity of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders, if any, to continue subject to compliance; affidavit in reply/rejoinder to be filed before next date; matters listed For Admission on 25/07/2025, 28/07/2025, 29/07/2025, 30/07/2025 and 31/07/2025 (board serial nos. 31-32, 36-48, 50-57, 59-70, 71-87); purely administrative/scheduling order with no merits decision, no parties or advocates named, no statutes or precedents cited.
What did the court decide?
Administrative listing order: hearing of the batch deferred for paucity of time; all office objections to be removed within two weeks; subject to such compliance, ad-interim/interim orders, if any granted earlier, to continue; affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, to be filed before the next date; matters listed for Admission on 25/07/2025, 28/07/2025, 29/07/2025, 30/07/2025 and 31/07/2025 per the chart in paragraph 5.