Kunal Rajkishor Pandey v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC17 Feb 2025BA/1014/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court criminal bail application (No.1014 of 2024), Kunal Rajkishor Pandey v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.; adjournment order by S. M. Modak J. dated 12-12-2025; Respondent No.2 to be served by local police; APP's assurance to inform Respondent No.2 of next hearing date accepted; stand over to 16-01-2026; no appearance by applicant; no merits, statute or precedent decided.

What did the court decide?

The Court accepted the learned APP's assurance that the local Police will inform Respondent No.2 of the next date of hearing. ¶¶21

Kunal Rajkishor Pandey vs State of Maharashtra — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

8-BA-1014-2024 .doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR

¶4

Digitally signed by SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2025.12.12 19:54:03 +0530

¶5

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1014 OF 2024

¶6

Kunal Rajkishor Pandey ...Applicant

¶7

V/s.

¶8

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

¶9

...Respondents

¶10

*****

¶11

No one ispresent:-	On behalf of the Applicant.
Mr.Tanveer Khan:-	APP for Respondent No.1–State.
Mr.Sachin RameshJadhav – API:-	Dharavi Police Station, Mumbai.

¶12

*****

¶13

CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 12^th DECEMBER 2025

¶14

P. C. :-

¶15

It is true, on 12^th June 2025, there was no appearance on behalf of the Applicant. Today also, no one is present.

¶16

This Court on 27^th November 2024, had directed the

¶17

Investigating Officer to inform the Respondent No.2. Today, the same Officer Mr.Sachin Jadhav – API is present. For some reason or other, the Respondent No.2 could not be informed about pendency of this Application.

Satish Sangar

1/2

8-BA-1014-2024 .doc