Bail application by an accused charged under IPC, POCSO and PITA provisions. The court directed the applicant to implead the victim as Respondent No.2 with identity concealed, carry out amendment within a week, serve copies, and adjourned the hearing to 15 April 2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20 ba 1014 of 2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.1014 OF 2024
Kunal Rajkishor Pandey
versus
The State of Maharashtra
… Respondent
None for Applicant.
Mr. S.R.Aagarkar, APP for State. PSI Anilkumar Bhosale, Dharavi Police Station present.
CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J. DATE : 11 MARCH 2024
P.C.
370, 370A, 376, 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 4, 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Sections 4, 5 and 6 of the Prevention of Immoral Traffic Act, 1956.
Respondent No.1 and also furnish copy of the amended application to the IO for being served on the Respondent No.2.
SSP 1/2
20 ba 1014 of 2024.doc
( N.J.JAMADAR, J. )
SSP 2/2
Signed by: S.S.Phadke Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 12/03/2024 13:47:25
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Kunal Rajkishor Pandey
The State of Maharashtra
N.J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
18 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
