Rakesh Chandrabhan Agarwal vs Deepak Vilasraon Jagtap

This Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ( “the Act” ), seeking appointment of an arbitrator in connection with disputes and differences that are said to have arisen between the parties under a Partnership Deed dated February 01, 2011 ( “Agreement” ). The arbitration agreement is contained in Clause 19 (found at Page 24 of the Petition). In the interest of brevity, the arbitration agreement is not being extracted here. Suffice it to say that this matter falls within the jurisdiction of this Court.

¶10

It is apparent from the record that the arbitration

¶11

Page 1 of 5 March 20, 2025

¶12

513 ARP.35.2025 copy.docx

¶13

agreement was invoked by the Petitioner on September 18, 2024. There is no response from the Respondents to invocation notice.

¶14

It is seen from the affidavit of service dated February 21, 2025 that service has indeed been effected. In these circumstances no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending any further on the docket of this Court considering that the existence of an arbitration agreement is writ large on the face of the record.

¶15

The scope of review under Section 11 is explicitly set out in Section 11(6A) of the Act. It is now trite law, with particular regard to the decisions of a seven-judge bench in the Interplay Judgement¹ followed by multiple others, including SBI General² and Patel³ that the Section 11 Court ought not to venture beyond examining the existence of a validly existing arbitration agreement that has been formally executed. Even questions of existential substance is a matter that falls squarely in the domain of the arbitral tribunal, in view of Section 16 of the Act.

¶16

Being satisfied that an arbitration agreement is validly in existence, and that arbitration has been duly invoked, it is in the fitness of things to refer the disputes and

¶17

1 In Re: Interplay Between Arbitration Agreements Under Arbitration and

¶18

Conciliation Act, 1996 & Stamp Act, 1899 – (2024) 6 SCC 1

¶19

2 SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Krish Spinning – 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1754

¶20

3 Ajay Madhusudan Patel v. Jyotrindra S. Patel – 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2597

¶21

Page 2 of 5

¶22

March 20, 2025

¶23

R.V.Patil

¶24

513 ARP.35.2025 copy.docx

¶25

differences between the parties in connection with the aforesaid Agreement dated February 01, 2011 to arbitration by a Sole Arbitrator.

¶26

The arbitration agreement does not specify the venue and seat of arbitration and it is apparent that the parties are from Pune. Consequently, this Petition is finally disposed of in the following terms:

¶27

A] The disputes and differences covered by this Petition are hereby referred to the Indian Law Society’s Centre for Arbitration and Mediation, Pune (https://ilsca.co.in), in terms of its Institutional Arbitration Rules, to appoint an appropriate arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes and differences between the parties arising out of and in connection with the Agreement referred to above, and to administer the same;

¶28

B] A copy of this Order will be communicated to the Indian Law Society’s Centre for Arbitration and Mediation, Pune by the Advocates for the Petitioner within a period of one week from the date on which this order is uploaded on the website of this Court. The Petitioner shall provide the contact and communication particulars of the parties to the Centre along with a copy of this Order;

¶29

Page 3 of 5 March 20, 2025

¶30

R.V.Patil

¶31

513 ARP.35.2025 copy.docx

¶32

C] The Learned Sole Arbitrator is requested to forward the statutory Statement of Disclosure under Section 11(8) read with Section 12(1) of the Act to the Advocates for the Petitioner so as to enable them to file the same in the Registry of this Court. The Registry of this Court shall retain the said Statement on the file of this Petition and a copy of the same shall be furnished by the Advocates for the Petitioner to the Respondents;

¶33

D] The parties shall appear before the Learned Sole Arbitrator on such date and at such place as indicated, to obtain appropriate directions with regard to conduct of the arbitration including fixing a schedule for pleadings, examination of witnesses, if any, schedule of hearings etc. At such meeting, the parties shall provide a valid and functional email address along with mobile and landline numbers of the respective Advocates of the parties to the Arbitral Tribunal. Communications to such email addresses shall constitute valid service of correspondence in connection with the arbitration;

¶34

E] All arbitral costs and fees of the Arbitral Tribunal shall be borne by the parties equally in the first instance, and shall be subject to any final Award that may be passed by the Tribunal in Page 4 of 5 March 20, 2025

¶35

R.V.Patil

¶36

513 ARP.35.2025 copy.docx

¶37

relation to costs.

¶38

Needless to say, nothing contained in this order is an expression of an opinion on merits of the matter or the relative strength of the parties. All issues on merits are expressly kept open to be agitated before the arbitral tribunal appointed hereby.

¶39

All actions required to be taken pursuant to this order shall be taken upon receipt of a downloaded copy as available on this Court’s website.

¶40

[SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.]

¶41

Page 5 of 5 March 20, 2025

¶42

R.V.Patil

Rakesh Chandrabhan Agarwal v. Deepak Vilasraon Jagtap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Chandrabhan Agarwal v. Deepak Vilasraon Jagtap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rika Global Impex Limited vs Surya Mitra Traders Prop Maheshwar Rao

Sany Heavy Industry India Pvt. Ltd. vs Ramesh Jivalu Pawar

Siemens Healthcare Private Limited vs Animesh Baruah

Rudra Super Structures LLP vs Aditya D. Goyal and 2 Ors.

Om Metal Consortium vs Maharashtra Housing and Area Developement Authority

Ambuja Cements Ltd. vs Ess Ess Technofabs Pvt. Ltd.