Prashant Murlidhar Raje v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Short interim/adjournment order in an anticipatory bail application (Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2658 of 2024, Bombay High Court, R.N. Laddha, J., dated 7 August 2025): interim protection that no coercive steps be taken against applicant Prashant Murlidhar Raje in the pending crime was continued till 3 September 2025; matter adjourned by consent; leave to annex additional documents granted. The crime number and offences are not stated; PI Anil Jadhav of Mahim Police Station was present. No statutes, precedents or monetary amounts were addressed, and the anticipatory bail question itself remains undecided - not a citable determination on pre-arrest bail.
What did the court decide?
By consent the application was adjourned (stood over) to 3 September 2025, and the earlier order that no coercive steps be taken against the applicant in the present crime was continued to operate till the next date; leave was also granted to annex additional documents. No final decision was pronounced on the anticipatory bail prayer.