Prashant Murlidhar Raje v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim order in anticipatory bail application; applicant sought time to deposit Rs.65,000 and legal aid advocate was appointed for the first informant; no coercive action against applicant till next date.
What did the court decide?
No coercive action against the applicant till next date; matter stood over to 9 December 2024.
What the court decided
Digitally signed by CHITRA CHITRA SANJAYSONAWANE SANJAYSONAWANE Date:2024.11.27 22:33:28 Chitra Sonawane +0530 19-aba-2658-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No.2658 of 2024
Prashant M Raje
…... Applicant.
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …... Respondents.
Ms Sofiya Shaikh i/by Mohd Ahmed Shaikh for the applicant. Mr Yogesh Dabke, APP for respondent/State. WPSI AH Shinde, Mahim police station. Informant Mohini Kiran Keni present in person.
Coram : R.N.Laddha, J. Date : 27 November 2024.
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the applicant, following the instructions, submits that due to some unavoidable circumstances, she was unable to deposit the remaining amount of Rs.65,000/-. However, she is willing to deposit this amount within two weeks from today.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Prashant M Raje
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
R.N.Laddha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
21 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Vasundhara Bahuudeshiya Samajik Sanstha, Buldhana Thr. Its President Vs the Asstt. Provident Funds Commissioner, Akola
Sunita Arun Kangale and Another Vs the Maha. Slum Areas (I.C. and R) Tribunal, Mumbai and Others
Anant S/O Narayanrao Gharad and Others Vs the Honble Minister, Co-Operation, Marketing and Textiles, Mumbai and Others
Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Wardha and Others Vs Shri. Shankar Marotrao Bhal,E and Others