Haider Shaikh vs the State of Maharashtra

Shivaji Nagar Police Station, Pune City for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 324, 341, 143, 144, 147, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, Sections 3, 7 of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2013, 37(1) and 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.

¶27

An FIR has been lodged on the complaint filed by the cousin brother of Kulsum Mohd. Shaikh.

¶28

One more crime has been registered wherein the applicant Haider Shaikh has been shown as accused being Crime No. 124/2023 registered with Khadki Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 324, 323, 504, 143, 147, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code. So also, Sections 37(1) (3), 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act.

¶29

Both the parties submit that there was matrimonial dispute between Kulsum and her husband. Out of the marriage of Kulsum with her husband, there are three children. Due to the matrimonial dispute, the family of the Kulsum consisting of her brothers and cousin

¶30

KVM

¶31

3/5

¶32

3 - ABA 3531 OF 2024.doc

¶33

brothers and the family of her husband with her brothers had physical fight due to which an FIRs have been lodged. Both the learned counsel submit that the parties have put an rest their differences and Kulsum is residing with her husband and his family members. Hence, Mr.Jain, learned counsel appearing for Kulsum on instructions from client who is present in Court submits that there is no serious objection from Kulsum as regards the granting of the prearrest bail as the applicant (Haider) is her husband’s younger brother who is about to get married.

¶34

5. Considering the facts as mentioned above, I am satisfied that as

¶35

of today, pre-arrest bail can be granted to the applicant. Hence, the following order :-

¶36

ORDER

¶37

(a) The anticipatory bail applications are allowed.

¶38

(b) In the event of arrest in connection with FIR No. 0082 dated 22^nd April, 2023 registered with Shivaji Nagar Police Station, Pune City for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 324, 341, 143, 144, 147, 148, 149 of

¶39

KVM

¶40

4/5

¶41

3 - ABA 3531 OF 2024.doc

¶42

the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, Sections 3, 7 of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2013, 37(1) and 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 and Crime No. 124/2023 registered with Khadki Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 324, 323, 504, 143, 147, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code. So also, Sections 37(1) (3), 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, the applicants shall be released on bail, on furnishing P.R. bonds to the extent of Rs.15,000/- each with two or more sureties of the like amount.

¶43

(c) The applicants shall co-operate with the investigation and attend the Investigating Officer of the concerned Police Station on 19^th March 2025 and 20^th March 2025 between 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. and thereafter as and when called.

¶44

KVM

¶45

3 - ABA 3531 OF 2024.doc

¶46

(d) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly

¶47

make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with facts of case so as to dissuade him from disclosing the facts to Court or any Police

¶48

Officer and shall not tamper with evidence.

¶49

(e) The applicants shall furnish details of their residential addresses, contact numbers and e-mail addresses to the Investigating Officer.

¶50

The anticipatory bail applications are disposed of .

¶51

[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]

¶52

Signed by: Kanchan V. Mayekar Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 15/03/2025 17:25:39

Haider Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Haider Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Deepa Sudesh Shinde vs State of Maharashtra

Didar Dildar Hussain Shaikh vs State of Maharashtra

Surekha Sudhir Sakhare vs State of Maharashtra

Bharat Dnyandeo Ghadge vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

The Executive Engineer, Raigad vs Alisab Ibrahim Mahaldar and Ors.

Raj Subodh Singhania vs the State of Maharashtra