Bharat Dnyandeo Ghadge v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Complainant/third-party intervention in an anticipatory bail matter before the Bombay High Court (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction). IA No. 1113 of 2024 in ABA No. 384 of 2024; single Judge: Rajesh S. Patil; order dated 27-01-2025. Intervention allowed in terms of prayer Clause 1(a); application disposed of. Parties: Bharat Dnyandeo Ghadage (applicant/intervener, original complainant); Anil Kondiba Babar & Anr. (applicants/accused); State of Maharashtra (respondent). Counsel: Sachin M. Bhavsar; Rupesh Bobade; Prasanna P. Malashe (APP). Police station: Tembhurni. Useful for research on leave to intervene by the original complainant in bail applications.
What did the court decide?
Prayer Clause 1(a) granted: the Intervener/Complainant (original complainant) allowed to intervene in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 384 of 2024. ¶21