Omkar Sudam Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Omnibus adjournment order, High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, Justice Neeraj P. Dhote, 06.10.2025. On ground of 'paucity of time', all matters listed were adjourned to dates mentioned against them (08.10.2025, 09.10.2025, 10.10.2025, 10.11.2025, 11.11.2025 and 12.11.2025); interim relief/undertaking/statement, if any, continues till the next date. Matters include numerous Anticipatory Bail Applications (Nos. 638, 819, 903 and 1609 of 2025 expressly marked, and a wide run of 2024/2025 ABAs), connected Criminal Applications (e.g., Applns. 2261, 2653, 2678, 3131, 3441, 1361, 1509, 2783, 3637 of 2025; Cr. Appln. 1001 of 2023), five Applications for Cancellation of Bail (Nos. 24 of 2020, 40 of 2024, 49 of 2024, 131 of 2025, 136 of 2025) and Criminal Appeal No. 289 of 2024. State represented by APPs M. K. Goyanka, C. V. Bhadane, B. B. Bhise, N. D. Batule, S. K. Shirse and G. A. Kulkarni. Purely administrative/scheduling order; no statute, precedent, issue or quantum; not citable for any legal proposition.