Pandit Vasaram Rathod v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: paucity of time; adjournment order; Aurangabad Bench; Bombay High Court; Neeraj P. Dhote, J.; 06.10.2025; anticipatory bail batch (ABA 1175-1715/2025, ABA 1314/1354/1793/2024, ABA 638/819/903/1609/2025); connected criminal applications; Criminal Appeal No. 289 of 2024; Applications for Cancellation of Bail Nos. 24/2020, 40/2024, 49/2024, 131/2025, 136/2025; next dates 08.10.2025, 09.10.2025, 10.10.2025, 10.11.2025, 11.11.2025, 12.11.2025; interim relief/undertaking/statement to continue till next date; APPs Goyanka, Bhadane, Bhise, Batule, Shirse, Kulkarni for State. Purely administrative listing order — contains no ruling on merits, no statutory interpretation and no precedent discussion; useful mainly to evidence that interim protections in the listed matters continued past 06.10.2025.
What did the court decide?
Administrative adjournment only: the listed matters (serial nos. 44-99 and 901-904) are adjourned to dates between 08.10.2025 and 12.11.2025, and any subsisting interim relief/undertaking/statement is directed to continue till the next date. No merits decided.