Disposed

Dnyandeep Sanskar Bhaarti Va Bahuddeshiya Sanstha Throu. Joint Sec. Prakash S Hake v. the Honble Assistant Charity Commissioner and Anr.

Bombay HC22 Jul 2024WP/9904/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Trust sought a direction to the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Solapur to decide pending Change Reports in a time frame. The Court declined to grant out-of-turn hearing, holding all litigants are equal and must await adjudication in queue, and disposed of the writ petition.

What the court decided

AI extract

Dnyandeep Sanskar Bhaarti Va Bahuddeshiya Sanstha Throu. Joint Sec. Prakash S Hake vs the Honble Assistant Charity Commissioner and Anr. — Bombay HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 907.WP9904.2024.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 9904 OF 2024

¶4

Dnyandeep Sanskar Bharati Va Bahuddeshiya Sanstha. … Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Hon’ble Assistant Charity Commissioner, Solapur & Anr. … Respondents.

¶7

¶8

Mr. Bajrang Solanke a/w. Ms. Vishakha Shelar, i/b. Ambaji Rayani, for the Petitioner.

¶9

Mr. B.V. Samant, Addl. GP with Mr. M.M. Pable, AGP for Respondent/State.

¶10

¶11

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.

¶12

DATE : 19^th NOVEMBER, 2024

¶13

P.C. :

¶14

The Petitioner has preferred this Petition for seeking a

¶15

direction to the learned Assistant Charity Commissioner, Solapur to

¶16

decide the pending Change Reports, within a time frame.

¶17

We have consistently held that merely because a litigant approaches the High Court for framing a time line, does not mean that this Court should pass orders and direct the adjudication in the pending

¶18

Talwalkar

¶19

2 907.WP9904.2024.odt

¶20

proceedings, by jumping the queue and by granting ‘out of turn’ hearing. All litigants are equal in the eyes of law and all are waiting in queue for adjudication of their pending proceedings. In these circumstances, we are not inclined to treat the cases of this Petitioner as special cases for being granted an out of turn hearing.

¶21

In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed off .

¶22

Needless to state, that the learned Assistant Charity Commissioner, Solapur would consider the pendency before him and depending upon the dates on which the Change Reports have been filed, he would proceed to deal with the Change Reports in queue as per the date of lodging of the proceedings.

¶23

Registry of this Court shall transmit this order to the

¶24

concerned Assistant Charity Commissioner, Solapur.

¶25

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

¶26

ARUNA SANDEEP TALWALKAR

¶27

Digitally signed by ARUNASANDEEP TALWALKAR Date: 2024.11.22 10:51:51 +0530

¶28

Talwalkar

Dnyandeep Sanskar Bhaarti Va Bahuddeshiya Sanstha Throu. Joint Sec. Prakash S Hake v. the Honble Assistant Charity Commissioner and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Dnyandeep Sanskar Bhaarti Va Bahuddeshiya Sanstha Throu. Joint Sec. Prakash S Hake v. the Honble Assistant Charity Commissioner and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vasdev H. Rajani vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

Navneet Baban Gaikwad vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary and Ors.

Vishal Vilas Tendulkar vs the Secretary Rayat Sikshan Sanstha and Ors.

Yogita Pritam Shejale vs State of Maharashtra School Education and Sports Department

Executives Association Rgppl and Ors. vs Ratnagiri Gas and Power Pvt. Ltd. (Rgppl) and Ors.

Shubhra Umar Ghatage and Ors. vs Kolhapur District Security Guards Board and Anr.