Vishal Vilas Tendulkar v. the Secretary Rayat Sikshan Sanstha and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/9669/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A Bombay High Court administrative listing order deferring a batch of matters for hearing due to paucity of time, directing removal of office objections and continuation of interim orders.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Talwalkar .. 1 .. common order 2
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
¶4
DATE :- 12TH NOVEMBER, 2024
¶5
Per Court :-
¶6
- At the time of rising at 5.45 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.
¶7
- In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
¶8
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.
¶9
- The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed
¶10
before the next date.
¶11
- Subject to the above, list these matters as under:-
Coram
AI extract
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Ashwin D. Bhobe
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court