Pratiksha Vijay Mule v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition against the State of Maharashtra and others came up for admission. The court directed the petitioner to serve notice on respondent nos. 4 and 5 and file an affidavit of service, and adjourned the matter to a later date.
What the court decided
Digitally signed by ANANT ANANTKRISHNA KRISHNANAIKDate: NAIK 2024.07.25 17:42:00 +0530
14.WP.9787.2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 9787 OF 2024
Pratiksha Vijay Mule ...Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Ors ...Respondents
Mr. Satyajeet A. Rajeshirke for the Petitioner.
Mr. B. V. Samant, Addl. GP a/w. Mr. Abhijeet Naik, AGP for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M. M. SATHAYE, JJ.
DATED : 25 JULY 2024
P.C.:
- The Petitioner will give notice to the Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 and file affidavit of service.
- Stand over to 16 August 2024 .
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pratiksha Vijay Mule
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Respondent No. 2
- respondent
Respondent No. 3
- respondent
Respondent No. 4
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Lalit C. Joshi vs the Chairman and Managing Director Bank of Baroda and 2 Ors.
Cavas R Majai vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Dr. Prakash Tukaram Chaphekar and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Manojkumar Vijaysingh Patil vs State of Maharashtra Thr Urban Development Minister and Ors.