Interim application in a writ petition concerning Bank of Baroda, pending final hearing since 2020 after Supreme Court liberty. By consent the interim application was disposed of and the petition listed for weekly final hearing board.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-OS:20744-DB
4-IA-1968-2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1968 OF 2024 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.714 OF 2021
Lalit C. Joshi ... Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Lalit C. Joshi ... Petitioner Versus
The Chairman And Managing Director Bank Of Baroda And 2 Ors. ... Respondents
Adv. Divya Wadekar i/b Vaibhav Jagdale for the Applicant Adv. Vishal Talsania for the Respondents
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
DATE : 14th DECEMBER, 2024
Per Court :-
in Contempt Petition (C) No. 367 of 2020 in Civil Appeal No. 8555 of 2019. The Hon’ble Supreme Court clearly expressed in it’s order dated 4th June, 2020 that the Contempt Petition was not being entertained with
liberty, that if the Petitioner files a Petition in this Court, the same may be decided expeditiously.
1 of 2
Harish
4-IA-1968-2024.odt
final hearing was scheduled on 19th October, 2020. Since then, before various Benches, adjournments occurred.
3 By an order dated 31st July, 2023 passed by this Court [Nitin Jamdar (as his Lordship then was) and Sandip V. Marne JJ.], this Petition is listed in the weekly board commencing from 7th August, 2023.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
Signed by: Harish V. Chaudhari Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Harish Date: 17/12/2024 18:21:25
2 of 2
Lalit C. Joshi
The Chairman And Managing Director Bank Of Baroda
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Ashwin D. Bhobe
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
