A writ petition challenging an order fixing market rent in a landlord-tenant dispute was disposed of as infructuous because the parties had settled their dispute via a Lok Adalat.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
1/2
29 - WP 9757 OF 2019.doc
KANCHAN VINOD
MAYEKAR
Digitally signed by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date: 2024.04.23 18:37:21 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 9757 OF 2019
Umesh K. Suvarna
….. Petitioner
VERSUS
Bhupendra Amritlal Shah
….. Respondent
None for the Petitioner.
Mr.Onkar Gawade i/b. Mr.Jaydeep Deo for the Respondent.
CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 22 APRIL, 2024
P.C. :-
The present writ petition is filed by the original defendant
challenging an order passed by the Appellate Bench of the Court
of Small Causes thereby fixing market rent, as per the ratio laid
down by the Supreme Court in case of Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd. Vs. Federal Motors (P) Ltd., (2005) 1 SCC 705.
submits that the parties have settled their disputes before the
KVM
2/2
29 - WP 9757 OF 2019.doc
Appellate Bench by filing consent terms. He has tendered a copy
of the order dated 9 December, 2023 passed by the Lok Adalat.
[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]
Umesh K. Suvarna
Bhupendra Amritlal Shah
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
