Disposed

Suruchi Kunal Shah @ Suruchi Champaklal Shah v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Government Pleader and Ors.

Bombay HC19 Apr 2024WP/7196/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A wife petitioned against a Family Court at Bandra order granting the husband weekend access to their minor son. The judge found no infirmity in the access order but modified the timing to 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. on Saturdays and moved the venue from the Family Court Children Complex to Oberoi Mall, Malad.

What the court decided

AI extract

Suruchi Kunal Shah @ Suruchi Champaklal Shah… — Child Custody and Guardianship | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

907-wp7196-22.doc

¶2

vai

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL

¶6

Digitally signed by VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Date: 2024.04.22 WRIT PETITION NO.7196 OF 2022 18:10:40 +0530

¶7

Suruchi K. Shah ..Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents

¶8

Mr.Shashikant P. Chaudhari with Ms.Snehal S. Chaudhari and Ms.Usha Chaudhari i/b Maharashtra Law Associates for the Petitioner.

¶9

Mr.A.K. Naik, AGP for the State - Respondent No.1.

¶10

None for Respondent No.2.

¶11

CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 19TH APRIL, 2024.

¶12

P.C. :-

¶13

This Writ Petition is filed by the wife challenging the

¶14

order dated 18 April 2022 passed by the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai.

¶15

By the impugned order, the Family Court at Bandra,

¶16

Mumbai has allowed the access of the minor son to the husband

¶17

1/3

¶18

907-wp7196-22.doc

¶19

of each working Saturday i.e. 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. in the Children Complex of the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai and also four hours access to the husband on the birthday of the child i.e. on 26 June.

¶20

The only argument made by Mr.Chaudhari on behalf of the Wife is that the husband has not paid any amount towards the maintenance of the child. He submits that the application for maintenance is pending before the Magistrate Court, Mumbai.

¶21

I find no infirmity in the order passed by the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai.

¶22

At this stage, Mr.Chaudhari submits that since the son on every Saturday has tuition class from 12:00 noon and drawing class at 4:00 p.m., hence for the sake convenience, I change the access timing to the husband from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. The husband can have access from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m and the said access is changed from Children Complex at Family Court, Bandra, Mumbai to Oberoi Mall at Malad. Since the advocate for the Respondent / Husband is not present when the order is dictated, liberty to Respondent No.2 / Husband to seek

¶23

2/3

¶24

907-wp7196-22.doc

¶25

any modification of the order.

¶26

The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.

¶27

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)

¶28

3/3

Suruchi Kunal Shah @ Suruchi Champaklal Shah v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Government Pleader and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Suruchi Kunal Shah @ Suruchi Champaklal Shah v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Government Pleader and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prajakta Siddhesh Paralkar Vs Siddhesh Paralkar

Kunika Rajesh Patil Vs Rajesh Panditrao Patil

Mr Nilesh Parakh vs Mrs Prachi Parakh Nee Prachi Sawant Wo Nilesh Parakh

Subhash Ladu Varadkar Vs Supriya Subhash Varadkar

Abhishek Ajit Chavan Vs Guari Abhishek Chavan

Dr. Archana Yashwant Thombare Vs Dr. Yashwant Nivaruti Thombare