Writ petition disposed of after both parties stated that earlier orders dated 8 and 14 December 2023 had been fully complied with; the court held nothing survived in the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
1/1
15 - WP 13524 OF 2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR
Digitally signed by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date: 2024.04.23 18:37:23 +0530
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 13524 OF 2023
Aarti Sabhaney Thr Her Constituted Attorney Namrata Bhagwan Shahani
….. Petitioner
VERSUS
Kuljit Singh Dayasingh Arora & Anr.
….. Respondents
Ms.Chaitra Rao for the Petitioner.
Mr.Prathamesh Chachad for the Respondents.
CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 22 APRIL, 2024
P.C. :-
Both the learned counsel submit that order dated 8
December, 2023, along with order dated 14 December, 2023 has
been fully complied with by the parties. Hence, since the orders
have been complied with, nothing survives in this petition.
[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]
Aarti Sabhaney Thr Her Constituted Attorney Namrata Bhagwan Shahani
Kuljit Singh Dayasingh Arora
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
