Anwar Liyakat Khan and Anr. v. Ramesh Dattatraya Dhone and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/9309/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Adjournment order only. Petitioners sought time to engage a new advocate after their previous advocate gave no-objection; the matter was stood over to a later date. Decides nothing of general application.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
10. CIVIL WP-9309-2024.docx
¶2
Amberkar
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
¶4
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶5
WRIT PETITION NO. 9309 OF 2024
¶6
Anwar Liyakat Khan& Anr. .. Petitioners
¶7
Versus
¶8
Ramesh Dattatraya Dhone & Ors. .. Respondents
¶9
- Ms. Shraddha Jadhav i/by K.M. Tripathy for Petitioners
¶10
- Mr. Vijay Upadhyay for Respondent No. 1
¶11
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : JULY 16, 2024
¶12
P. C.:
¶13
1. Heard.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Anwar Liyakat Khan
- respondent
Ramesh Dattatraya Dhone
Coram
AI extract
Milind N. Jadhav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
17 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Hawai Finance Private Limited vs Charmakar Nivara Kendra Grihnirman Sanstha Proposed
Vaibhav Kantilal Dattani vs Prameykant Devchandbhai Kakkad
Rajesh Moolchand Talreja vs Gopi Hassanand Talreja
Lalit Sagarmal Jain vs Late Meghraj S Khatanhar Alias Meghraj Khatanhar Alias Meghraj Shewaram Khatanhar Alias M S Khat