Allowed

Rajesh Moolchand Talreja v. Gopi Hassanand Talreja

Bombay HC15 Jul 2024IA/1608/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Probate amendment application seeking correction of entries at Sr. Nos. 2 and 3 of the Schedule of Assets. Additional affidavit with share certificates, death certificates of joint holders and consent affidavits of legal heirs filed. Court allowed the amendment in terms of prayer clause (a).

What did the court decide?

Amendment to Schedule of Assets per Exhibit B directed within three weeks; expedited amended grant.

Rajesh Moolchand Talreja vs Gopi Hassanand Talreja — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-OS:10754

¶2

25 ia 1608 of 2024.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1608 OF 2024

¶4

¶5

TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.2057 OF 2022

¶6

... Rajesh Moolchand Talreja Applicant/Petitioner

¶7

Gopi Hassanand Talreja … Deceased

¶8

Mr. B.G.Saraf, for Applicant.

¶9

CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J.

¶10

DATE : 22 JULY 2024

¶11

P.C.

¶12

Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant.

¶13

This application is preferred for post grant amendment in the Probate of

¶14

the last Will and Testament of Gopi Hassanand Talreja. In the application, it is averred that post grant of Probate, it was realized that certain corrections were required at Sr. Nos.2 and 3 of the Schedule of Assets.

¶15

By an order dated 15 July 2024, the applicant was directed to file an additional affidavit.

¶16

Learned Counsel for the Applicant seeks leave to tender additional affidavit of the applicant. Copies of the share certificates are annexed to the affidavit.

¶17

It is affirmed that Nath @ Nathlal Talreja and Shobha Talreja, who were the joint holders of the shares alongwith the deceased, have passed away. Copies of the death

¶18

SSP 1/2

¶19

25 ia 1608 of 2024.doc certificates of Nath @ Nathlal Talreja and Shobha Talreja are also annexed to the additional Affidavit. The legal heirs of Nath @ Nathlal Talreja viz. Dilip N. Talreja, Jagdish N. Talreja and Vinod N. Talreja, have filed affidavits giving consent for the amendment in the grant.

¶20

In view of the above, I do not find any impediment in allowing the post grant amendment.

¶21

The application, thus, stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

¶22

Necessary amendment in the Schedule of assets in accordance with the

¶23

Schedule of amendment (Exhibit B) be carried out within a period of three weeks.

¶24

Post amendment grant expedited.

¶25

Interim Application stands disposed.

¶26

( N.J.JAMADAR, J. )

¶27

SSP 2/2

¶28

Signed by: S.S.Phadke Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 23/07/2024 12:47:09

Rajesh Moolchand Talreja v. Gopi Hassanand Talreja

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Moolchand Talreja v. Gopi Hassanand Talreja

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Prema Amritham Aiyer (Niece of Late Mary Moses Peter) vs Sudha Vitthal Amarapurkar and Anr.

Assistant Division Engineer vs Shivmoori Jagatdev Kushwaha Partner of Ms Stuti Enterprises

Union of India vs the Liquidator

Chemco Plastic Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs Chemco Plast

Saleha Khaleel Shaikh vs Mohd Yusuf Ramzan Shaikh (Deceased)

Saleha Khaleel Shaikh vs Mohd Yusuf Ramzan Shaikh (Deceased)