The court dismissed two writ petitions following the filing of a review against the impugned order, noting that the review itself indicated reasons for formulating grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
916-WP-9005-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 9005 OF 2024
Shankar Parshuram Jadhav @ Padekar (Since Decease Through Legal Heirs) And Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Yaswant Bango Patil ...Respondent
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 9006 OF 2024
Shankar Parshuram Jadhav @ Padekar (Since Decease Through Legal Heirs) And Ors. ...Petitioners Versus
Yaswant Bango Patil ...Respondent
Mr. Bharatkumar Nuktefor the Petitioners.
Mr. Rohit D. Joshi for Respondent
CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J. DATE : 3rd JULY 2024
P.C.:
order, the same would indicate reasons available so as to formulate the grounds for review, Considering which, both the petitions are dismissed.
(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
Digitally signed by SAJAKALI SAJAKALI LIYAKAT LIYAKAT JAMADAR JAMADAR Date:2024.07.03 18:27:18 +0530
1 of 1
Sajakali Jamadar
Shankar Parshuram Jadhav @ Padekar (Since Decease Through Legal Heirs) And Ors.
Yaswant Bango Patil
Avinash G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
