Writ petition regarding a senior citizens maintenance matter; relying on an Aurangabad Bench decision holding appeals maintainable even at a respondent's behest under Section 16 of the 2007 Act, the court relegated the petitioner to the appellate remedy, excluding time spent before it from limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12-WP-758-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL
Digitally signed by VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Date: 2024.07.01 20:06:04 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO. 758 OF 2024
Subhash Annasaheb Deshmukh ...Petitioner Versus Annasaheb Prataprao Deshmukh And Anr. ...Respondent
Mr.Nitin Gaware Patil for the Petitioner.
Mr.S.D. Rayrikar, AGP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J. DATE : 1ST JULY 2024
P.C.:
an appeal even at the behest of respondent under the provisions of 16 of The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 would be maintainable, in view of which the petitioner is relegated to appellate remedy. The time spent before this Court would not be considered for calculating the limitation.
(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
1 of 1
VAI
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be relegated to appeal under Section 16 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Subhash Annasaheb Deshmukh
Annasaheb Prataprao Deshmukh
Anr.
Avinash G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
