Writ petition argued at length by petitioners' counsel. The court showed disinclination to interfere with the impugned order, whereupon the counsel sought and obtained leave to withdraw the petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with leave to withdraw.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:29214
903-WP-8365-2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 8365 OF 2024
Sumatilal Shantilal Baldota And Others
VERSUS
Deepak Chandmal Varma And Another *******
• Mr. S. S. Thombre, Advocate for the Petitioners *******
CORAM:R.M. JOSHI, J
DATE:DECEMBER 11, 2024
PER COURT :
1.Learned Counsel for the Petitioners has argued
the Petition for substantial time.
2.When this Court has shows disinclination to
cause interference in the impugned order, he, on
instructions, seeks withdrawal of the Petition.
3.Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
PAGE 1 OF 1
Umesh
Sumatilal Shantilal Baldota And Others
Deepak Chandmal Varma
Another
R.M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court