Dismissed

The Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Jaya Alais Gangasagar Dattatrao Dhawale and Others

Bombay HC10 Dec 2024WP/4628/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Writ Court dismissed the Corporation's petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal seeking impleadment of a motorcycle owner and driver, relying on precedent that claimants cannot be compelled to join joint tortfeasors as parties, subject to clarification that the claim may fail if the bus driver is found non-negligent.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition seeking impleadment of the owner and driver in the Motor Accident Claims Proceedings was dismissed.

The Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road… — Motor Accident Claims | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-AUG:29812

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 4628 OF 2020

¶4

The Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation VERSUS Jaya Alais Gangasagar Dattatrao Dhawale And Others

¶5

Mr. A. D. Wange, Advocate for petitioner Mr. B. N. Gadegaonkar, Advocate for respondent No.1 to 4

¶6

CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 10^th DECEMBER, 2024

¶7

PER COURT :-

¶8

This petition takes exception to the order dated 27.08.2019 passed below Exhibit 18 moved by the petitioner before the Tribunal seeking impleadment of a driver and owner of motorcycle which was involved in the accident in question.

¶9

Petitioner MSRTC is respondent in M.A.C.P No. 340/2018. Deceased died in an accident involving State Transport Bus bearing No. MH-09-EM-2296 and motorcycle bearing No. MH-22-AL-1280. Deceased was pillion rider of motorcycle. The claimants who are the legal heirs of deceased, prosecuted MSRTC seeking compensation in respect of the said accidental death of the deceased. MSRTC moved application Exhibit 18 for joining the owner and driver of motorcycle with the contention that the rider of the said motorcycle is responsible for the accident in

¶10

1 of 3

¶11

903-WP-4628-2020.odt

¶12

question and that a driver of the bus is not responsible therefor. Since, this application rejected, present petition is filed.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in order to determine the negligence of the rider of the motorcycle, it is necessary that the said rider as well as owner are made party to the said proceeding.

¶14

. This contention is opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent by contending that the respondent/original claimants are dominus litis and that they cannot force to seek relief against undesired parties. He places reliance on the judgment of the coordinate bench of this court in the case of Shri. G. Chandrashekharan Shivam And Ors. Versus Mr. Rajkumar Agarwal & Ors., Writ Petition No. 1173 of 2020 and connected matters.

¶15

There cannot be any dispute with regard to the proposition of law that it is open for the claimant to recover the entire compensation from one or both joint tortfeasers particularly in accident caused by composite negligence of two vehicles. The judgment of the coordinate bench of this Court is passed, relying upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Khenyei V. New India Assurance Company Ltd, 2015 ACJ 1441 SC. Thus, claimant cannot be compelled to joint tortfeasers as a party to the plaint. Thus, there is no substance

2 of 3

903-WP-4628-2020.odt

in the petition.

Dismissal of petition however is required to be done with clarification that in case, the MSRTC succeeds to prove that there was no negligence on the part of the driver of the bus, the entire claim of the claimants may get rejected.

¶20

In view of the above, petition stands dismissed.

¶21

(R. M. JOSHI, J.)

¶22

bsj

¶23

3 of 3

¶24

903-WP-4628-2020.odt

The Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Jaya Alais Gangasagar Dattatrao Dhawale and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Jaya Alais Gangasagar Dattatrao Dhawale and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Avesh Abdul Kalam Shaikh vs State of Maharashtra

Vijaykumar Kashinath Biradar and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary and Others

Vijaykumar Kashinath Biradar and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary and Others

Vasantrao Naik Krishi Vidyapeeth and Another Vs Narayan Dhondiba Suryawanshi

Belapur Education Society through Its Authorized Trustees Sharad Ramvilas Somani Vs the State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary and Others

Premshri Madhukarrao Dandekar Vs Anil Ramchandra Jethwani and Another