The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn because the original civil suit had been decreed and the appeal against the decree was dismissed, rendering the petition infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
219.WP.825.2010.doc
HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.825 OF 2010
Jyoti Shridhar Kshirsagar Petitioner .. (Orig. Plaintiff)
Versus
Sudhagad Education Society Respondent .. (Orig. Defendant)
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : JANUARY 11, 2024
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Mokashi, learned Advocate for Petitioner.
2. Mr. Mokashi, learned Advocate for the Petitioner would
inform the Court that original Regular Civil Suit No.1 of 2009 has been decreed. Since the present Writ Petition arises out of interlocutory orders passed in the suit and thereafter by Appeal Court, the Writ Petition does not survive.
3. Mr. Mokashi further informs the Court that Appeal against
the decree passed in the suit has also been dismissed. The same is noted by the Court.
4. In view of the above, Writ Petition No.825 of 2010 stands dismissed as withdrawn.
H. H. SAWANT
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Digitally signed HARSHADAHANUMANT by HARSHADAHANUMANTSAWANT SAWANT Date: 2024.01.11 18:22:09 +0530
1 of 1
Jyoti Shridhar Kshirsagar
Sudhagad Education Society
MILIND N. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
