Writ petition filed by M/s. Vinayak Construction was disposed of as withdrawn after the petitioner's counsel, taking instructions, requested the court to strike out the petition.
Writ Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15.WP.36.2024.doc
HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.36 OF 2024
M/s. Vinayak Construction .. Petitioner Versus Mandabai Balaram Jadhav and Ors. .. Respondents
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : JANUARY 10, 2024
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Joshi, learned Advocate for Petitioner.
2. After this Court has expressed its mind to Mr. Joshi, that it is not inclined to accept the case of the Petitioner, Mr. Joshi in his usual fairness has taken instructions and seeks withdrawal of the Petition.
3. In view of the above, Writ Petition is disposed as withdrawn.
H. H. SAWANT
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Digitally signed HARSHADA by HARSHADAHANUMANT HANUMANT SAWANT SAWANT Date: 2024.01.10 17:58:39 +0530
1 of 1
M/s. Vinayak Construction
MANDABA BALARAM JADHAV AND ORS.
MILIND N. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
