The High Court at Bombay disposed of Writ Petition No.4009 of 2011 as infructuous because the petitioner was unrepresented and the respondent's counsel informed the Court of the situation.
Writ Petition disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
246-as-wp-4009-2011.doc
Vinaa Khadpe (P.S.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4009 OF 2011
Leela W/O Vasantrao Mahadik .. Petitioner Versus Balasaheb Daulatrao Mahadik and ors .. Respondents
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : JANUARY 11, 2024
P.C.:
1. None appears for the Petitioner.
2. Mr. Kumbhar, learned Advocate appearing for the
Respondents has informed this Court that Writ Petition has become
infructuous. His statement is recorded.
3. Writ Petition is disposed.
Vinaa Khadpe
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Digitally signed by VINA VINA ARVIND ARVIND KHADPE KHADPE Date: 2024.01.12 11:43:41 +0530
1 of 1
Leela W/O Vasantrao Mahadik
Balasaheb Daulatrao Mahadik
Milind N. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
