Disposed

Sunjay M. Ghalla v. the Chief Officer, Mumbai Bldg. Repair and Reconstruction Board

Bombay HC3 Apr 2024WP/778/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition concerning redevelopment settled between petitioner and respondents Nos 8 to 12 via signed Consent Terms, which were taken on record and accepted. Petition disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms; MHADA directed to consider the redevelopment proposal at the earliest.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of in terms of signed Consent Terms; MHADA directed to consider the redevelopment proposal in accordance with law.

Sunjay M. Ghalla vs the Chief Officer, Mumbai Bldg. Repair… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

902-OSWP-778-2024.DOC

¶2

Wadhwa

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 778 OF 2024

¶4

Sunjay M Ghalla …Petitioner Versus

¶5

The Chief Officer, Mumbai Building Repair And Reconstruction Board …Respondent

¶6

Mr JK Shah , with Rahul Gupta, i/b RJ Law, for the Petitioner. Mr Saket Mone , with Shrey Shah, i/b Vidhii Partners, for Respondents Nos 4 to 7.

¶7

Mr Piyush Raheja , with Rubin Vakil, Jigar Shah, i/b Markand Gandhi & Co, for Respondent Nos 8 to 11.

¶8

Mr Rajiv Narula , with Milind Mane, i/b Jhangiani Narula & Associates, for Respondent No 12.

¶9

Mr Anirudh Hariani , with Niket Jani, i/b Jani & Parikh, for Respondent No 13.

¶10

Mr Sachin Karia , with Nikita Kadam, i/b Law Point Advocates & Solicitors, for Respondent No 14.

¶11

Mr Shubham Gurav , i/b Talekar & Associates, for MHADA.

¶12

CORAM G.S. Patel & Kamal Khata, JJ. DATED: 22nd April 2024

¶13

PC:-

¶14

1. The disputes between the Petitioner and Respondents Nos 8 to 11 and 12 are settled. Signed Consent Terms are tendered. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked “ X ” for

¶15

Digitally signed SANDHYA by SANDHYABHAGU BHAGU WADHWA WADHWA Date:2024.04.23 10:59:47 +0530

¶16

Page 1 of 3 22nd April 2024

¶17

902-OSWP-778-2024.DOC

¶18

identification with today’s date. The Consent Terms are signed by the 1st Petitioner, the 2nd Petitioner, Respondents Nos 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and their respective Advocates. The Consent Terms are in order. They are not contrary to law. We are satisfied that the parties have drawn the Consent Terms of their own volition and in reflection of their true intentions.

¶19

2. The undertakings, if any, in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings to the Court.

¶20

3. As between the Petitioner and Respondents Nos 8 to 11 and 12, the Petition is disposed of with an order in terms of the Consent Terms.

¶21

4. The Registry is to ensure that the hard copy of the signed Consent Terms is permanently retained on file as part of the record and is not sent for destruction in the normal course. A soft copy of the signed Consent Terms will be uploaded as the second order in the matter.

¶22

5. We clarify that parties are at liberty to tender a certified or authenticated copy of this order and of the Consent Terms, if required, before the Collector of Stamps or the Sub-Registrar of Assurances as the case may be.

¶23

6. In view of this, the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (“ MHADA ”) is directed to consider the proposal for redevelopment in accordance with law at the earliest.

¶24

Page 2 of 3 22nd April 2024

¶25

902-OSWP-778-2024.DOC

¶26

This consideration by MHADA will be subject to compliance with all applicable rules, regulations and policies.

¶27

(Kamal Khata, J)

¶28

(G. S. Patel, J)

¶29

Page 3 of 3 22nd April 2024

Sunjay M. Ghalla v. the Chief Officer, Mumbai Bldg. Repair and Reconstruction Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunjay M. Ghalla v. the Chief Officer, Mumbai Bldg. Repair and Reconstruction Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shanta Rathod and 2 Ors. vs Vishnu Gopal Krishna Prabhu

Shanta Rathod and 2 Others vs Bhairulal Ranglal Rathod and 18 Others

Shanta Rathod and 2 Ors. vs Vishnu Gopal Krishna Prabhu

Vithoba Rakhumai Chs Ltd. vs Municipal Corporation of Gr.Mumbai

Messers S D Desai and Co. vs State of Maharashtra

Oshiwara Link Plaza Commercial Premises Co-Operative Society Ltd. Vs Maharashtra Housing Area Development Authority (Mhada)