Dismissed

Shanta Rathod and 2 Others v. Bhairulal Ranglal Rathod and 18 Others

Bombay HC2 Apr 2024IA/795/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay disposed of Contempt Petition No. 11 of 2024 after recording signed consent terms tendered by the parties. The court accepted the terms, discharged the Show Cause Notice, and granted liberty to present documents for property transfers.

What did the court decide?

Show Cause Notice discharged; liberty granted to present consent terms and this order for property transfers.

Shanta Rathod and 2 Others vs Bhairulal Ranglal Rathod and… — Contempt of Court | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

903-OSCONPW-11-2024.DOC

¶2

Amol

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 11 OF 2024

¶4

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 2135 OF 2018

¶6

WITH

¶7

SHOW CAUSE NOTICE NO. 15 OF 2023

¶8

¶9

CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 11 OF 2024

¶10

WITH

¶11

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 795 OF 2024

¶12

¶13

WRIT PETITION NO. 2135 OF 2018

¶14

Shanta Rathod & Ors …Petitioners Versus

¶15

AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV

¶16

Digitally signed by AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV Date: 2024.04.03 09:43:51 +0530

¶17

Vishnu Gopal Krishna Prabhu & Ors

¶18

…Respondents

¶19

Ms Pushpa Ganediwala , i/b Chaitanya Purankar, for the Petitioners. Mr Atul Vanarse , AGP ,for the Respondent-State. Mr Jagdish N Jayale , for Respondents Nos 3 & 4.

¶20

CORAM G.S. Patel & Kamal Khata, JJ. DATED: 2nd April 2024

¶21

PC:-

¶22

1. The parties have settled their disputes. Consent Terms are tendered. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked ‘ X ’

¶23

Page 1 of 2

¶24

2nd April 2024

¶25

903-OSCONPW-11-2024.DOC

¶26

for identification with today’s date. These are signed by the parties and their respective Advocates. We are satisfied that the Consent Terms are in order, not contrary to law and have been drawn by the parties of their own volition in reflection of their true intentions.

¶27

2. The undertakings, if any, in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings to the Court.

¶28

3. The Show Cause Notice is discharged. The Contempt Petition is disposed of in these terms. No order as to costs.

¶29

4. A soft copy of the Consent Terms will be uploaded as the second order in the matter.

¶30

5. The Registry is to ensure that the hard copy of the signed Consent Terms is permanently retained on file as part of the record and is not sent for destruction in the ordinary course.

¶31

6. To effect the property transfers contemplated in the Consent Terms, liberty to the parties to present a certified or authenticated copy of these Consent Terms and a certified or an authenticated copy of this order before the Collector of Stamps or Sub-Registrar of Assurances, if required.

¶32

(Kamal Khata, J)

¶33

(G. S. Patel, J)

¶34

Page 2 of 2 2nd April 2024

Shanta Rathod and 2 Others v. Bhairulal Ranglal Rathod and 18 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shanta Rathod and 2 Others v. Bhairulal Ranglal Rathod and 18 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sarvesh Enterprises Vs Manish Digambar Sawant and 10 Ors.

Sunjay M. Ghalla vs the Chief Officer, Mumbai Bldg. Repair and Reconstruction Board

Sunjay M. Ghalla vs the Chief Officer, Mumbai Bldg. Repair and Reconstruction Board

Shanta Rathod and 2 Ors. vs Vishnu Gopal Krishna Prabhu

Shanta Rathod and 2 Ors. vs Vishnu Gopal Krishna Prabhu

Shanta Rathod and 2 Others vs Bhairulal Ranglal Rathod and 18 Others