Writ petition by M/s. Trigyn Technologies Ltd. against the Union of India and others; counsel stated on instructions that petitioners did not wish to pursue it, and the Bombay High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without adjudicating any issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19-WP.7677.2024
Jvs.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 7677 OF 2024
M/s. Trigyn Technologies Ltd. & Anr. } Petitioner
versus
Union of India & Ors. } Respondents
Mr. Vividh Tandan i/b. Mr. Prem Pandey for petitioners.
Mr. Parag Vyas with Ms. Nivedita M. Paltan, Ms. Rehana Dhawade and Ms.Karuna Yadav for UoI.
Ms. Bhagyashree Upadhyay-Tiwari i/b. Ms. Anita Dubey for respondent no. 4.
CORAM: DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATE: 29th JULY 2024
P.C.:
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, states that the petitioner does not want to pursue this writ petition and seeks its withdrawal.
JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE
2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Digitally signed by JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE Date: 2024.07.29 18:21:11 +0530
(AMIT BORKAR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
1
M/s. Trigyn Technologies Ltd.
Union of India
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
