Israr Jamil Ali Sayyad and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application stood over due to paucity of time; interim orders, if any, continued till next date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 171 OF 2024
Israr Jamil Ali Sayyad And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE J DATE : 8th October, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 12/11/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Israr Jamil Ali Sayyad
- respondent
State Of Maharashtra
Coram
Manish Pitale
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
18 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Shri. Sanjaykumar Annasaheb Chavan and Ors. Vs Manugraph Employees Association , UNIT-1 and Anr.
Satappa Shankar Patil and Ors. Vs Taluka Cooperative Election Officer Nee Assistant Registrar Cooperative Societies (Milk) and Ors.
Ravindra Ramchandra Mangore Vs Taluka Co-Operative Election Officer Nee Assistant Registrar Cooperative Societies (Milk) and Ors.
Smt. Neelam Ganesh Suryawanshi Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Prin. Secretary, Home (State Excise) Dept. and Ors.