The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioners appeared without cause and failed to pursue the matter despite prior notices.
The Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10.wp.7117.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.7117 OF 2019
Mrs. Sucheta Kumar Shinde And Anr ...Petitioners Vs
Mrs. Chanchal Popatlal Gandhi And Anr ...Respondents
None for the Petitioners. Shri. Swapnil Kamble, AGP for the State-Respondent No.2.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATED : 23 APRIL 2024
P.C.:
“1. This proceeding arises out of the the Leave and License Agreement. None appeared for the Petitioners when the matter is called out. The Petition is filed on 3 May 2019. No attempts were made by the Petitioners to circulate the matter up till now. It seems that the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing the Petition.
1
ADN
10.wp.7117.2019.doc
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
2
ADN
Mrs. Sucheta Kumar Shinde And Anr
Mrs. Chanchal Popatlal Gandhi And Anr
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
