Disposed

Girish Harishchandra Karande v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC17 Apr 2024IA/1629/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail in FIR alleging misappropriation of over Rs.55 lakhs by an employee through a parallel bank account. Court noted bank entries showing transactions between accounts, granting interim protection with conditions to attend police station and cooperate.

What did the court decide?

Ad-interim anticipatory bail: release on P.R. bond of Rs.30,000 with one or two sureties if arrested, order operating till 25.6.2024, subject to attending police station and cooperating with investiga

Girish Harishchandra Karande vs State of Maharashtra — Cheating and Forgery | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

: 1 :

¶2

905.aba-946-24.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.946 OF 2024

¶5

Pratik Machindra Pabale …..Applicant Versus

¶6

State of Maharashtra .... Respondent

¶7

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1629 OF 2024 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.946 OF 2024

¶8

Mr. Satyam H. Nimbalkar, Advocate a/w. Abhishek U. Arote for the Applicant.

¶9

Ms. Mahalakshmi Ganapathy, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. A.P. Jog, Advocate a/w. Rajesh More, Advocate for the Intervenor.

¶10

CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

¶11

DATE : 26^th APRIL, 2024

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

The Applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in

¶14

connection with C.R.No.75/2024 registered with Talegaon

¶15

1 of 7

¶16

Deshmane(PS)

¶17

: 2 : 905.aba-946-24.odt

¶18

Dabhade Police Station, District-Pimpri Chinchwad on 15.2.2024 under Sections 420, 408, 465, 467, 468 of IPC.

¶19

Heard Mr. Satyam Nimbalkar, learned counsel for the Applicant, Ms. Mahalakshmi Ganapathy, learned APP for the Respondent-State and Mr. A.P. Jog, learned counsel for the Intervenor.

¶20

The FIR is lodged by one Garish Karande. He has stated that he was having a business of land development by the name Adhiraj Land Developers. The present Applicant was working with him since 2016 in the capacity of Supervisor/Accountant. The informant’s firm had a bank account with ICICI Bank, Talegaon Dabhade. It was operated by the informant himself as the Proprietor. It is alleged that since the informant was busy in his work, the Applicant was handling all the financial aspects. The informant had given blank cheques signed by himself. He had also given letter-head with other keys of his office. It is alleged in the FIR that the Applicant took advantage of this

¶21

2 of 7

¶22

: 3 : 905.aba-946-24.odt

¶23

situation. He received some amount from the customers of the present informant RMK Builders and Namrata Builders. The FIR mentions that the informant was expecting certain amount from both of them but he had received lesser amount. There was difference of more than Rs.16 Lakhs in the payment which was to be received from Namrata Builders and there was such difference of more than Rs.37 Lakhs in respect of Namrata Builders. The informant made inquiries with those customers. He came to know that they had already made the payments but it was deposited in the account by the same name of Adhiraj Land Developers maintained with G.P. Parsik Co-operative Bank, Talegaon Dabhade. Said account was operated by the Applicant as a Proprietor of the same firm. Hence, the Applicant had committed misappropriation of those amounts. There are allegations that an amount of Rs.4,86,195/- given to the Applicant for paying EMI etc. was misappropriated by him. There are other allegations that the Applicant had taken diesel from Kalokhe Petrol

¶24

3 of 7

¶25

: 4 : 905.aba-946-24.odt

¶26

Pump and had misappropriated that diesel. Thus, the

¶27

Applicant has misappropriated the informant’s money to the tune of more than Rs.55 Lakhs. On this basis, the FIR is lodged.

¶28

Learned APP pointed out that the informant through his supplementary statement has claimed that the amount is much more.

¶29

Learned counsel for the Applicant invited my attention to the bank entries particularly on page Nos.194 and 128 of the present Application memo. He submitted that these entries show that not only the amount has been transferred from the ICICI Bank of the informant to the aforementioned account held with G.P. Parsik Co-operative Bank, but, even some substantial amount has gone from G.P. Parsik Bank to ICICI Bank account. There used to be regular transactions between the two bank accounts to the knowledge of the present informant. Some of the entries are even from October, 2022. Therefore, it falsifies the case

¶30

4 of 7

¶31

: 5 : 905.aba-946-24.odt

¶32

that he came to know about the existence of that account with G.P. Parsik Bank in February, 2024.

¶33

Learned counsel for the Applicant submitted that the GST number of the informant was suspended in the year 2020 and for facilitation of the regular business, the informant had opened the account with G.P. Parsik Bank. Only for convenience and for operation of that bank account, the Applicant’s name was shown. The Applicant has not misappropriated any amount. He submitted that as far as the misappropriation of diesel was concerned, the Applicant has paid Rs.2 Lakhs in cheque and Rs.6 Lakhs in cash. He, therefore, submitted that the Applicant be protected.

¶34

Learned APP submitted that the stand taken by the Applicant based on the bank entries will have to be verified by the investigating officer. For that purpose, the Applicant will have to attend the concerned police station and explain those bank entries and their usual course of

¶35

5 of 7

¶36

: 6 : 905.aba-946-24.odt

¶37

business. The Applicant be directed to attend the

¶38

concerned police station if the Court is inclined to grant adinterim relief.

¶39

Learned counsel for the first informant submitted that the informant is studied only upto 9^th standard. He was blindly trusting the present Applicant and, therefore, the Applicant has taken wrong advantage of that misplaced trust and has committed this offence.

¶40

I have considered these submissions. At this

¶41

stage, the learned counsel for the Applicant has relied on certain bank entries to show that the Applicant may have a reasonable defence in his favour. For that purpose, further investigation by the investigating officer is necessary. The informant also needs to be given an opportunity to explain the stand taken by the present Applicant. In this view of the matter, at this stage, the Applicant can be protected by way of ad-interim relief till the next date and he can be directed

¶42

to cooperate with the investigation.

¶43

6 of 7

¶44

: 7 : 905.aba-946-24.odt

¶45

Hence, the following order:

¶46

O R D E R

¶47

(i) In the event of his arrest in connection with C.R.No.75/2024 registered with Talegaon Dabhade Police Station, District-Pimpri Chinchwad, till the next date, the Applicant be released on bail on his executing P.R. bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/(Rupees Thirty Thousand Only) with one or two sureties in the like amount.

¶48

(ii) This order shall operate till 25.6.2024.

¶49

(iii) The Applicant shall attend the concerned Police Station from on 13^th , 14^th , 15^th and 16^th May, 2024 between 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. and thereafter as and when called. The Applicant shall cooperate with the investigation.

¶50

(iv) Stand over to 25.6.2024.

¶51

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)

¶52

Digitally signed by PRADIPKUMAR PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE DESHMANE Date: 2024.04.29 18:38:40 +0530

¶53

7 of 7

Girish Harishchandra Karande v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Girish Harishchandra Karande v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Gopal Harprasad Ruhela Vs Shri Bhagwati Prasad Alias Bhagwat S/O Sardarilal, Thr. General Poa Mr. Dharmesh Manoj Rajput

Anant Prabhakar Shekdar Vs Shruti Anant Shekdar

Yusuf Ismail Shaikh and Ors. Vs Khaliluddin Asrafuddin Khatib and Anr.

Shri Vasant Shankar Thorat Since Deceased Throu. His Representative Vs Sadanand Kadu Shetty

Michele Boutique through Its Partners and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra through the Govt. Pleader and Ors.

The State of Maharashtra (through the Special Land Acquisition Officer) vs Smt. Aruna Anant Bhoir (Since Deceased) Thr. Her Lrs. Shri Manoj Anant Bhoir and Ors.