Writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear despite notice. The interim application was disposed of consequentially.
Dismissing the writ petition for non-prosecution and disposing of the interim application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neeta Sawant 25-WP-6898-1998.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6898 OF 1998 WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1854 OF 2024
Narayan Kashinath Ponkshe } ….Petitioner : Versus : Smt. Padmavati w/o. Shivlinga Kumbhar and Ors. } ….Respondents
} ….Respondents
None for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED : 13 SEPTEMBER 2024.
P.C. :
Digitally signed by NEETA NEETA SHAILESH SHAILESH SAWANT SAWANT Date: 2024.09.19 15:04:57 +0530
[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]
____Page No.1 of 1 ___ 13 September 2024
Narayan Kashinath Ponkshe
Smt. Padmavati w/o. Shivlinga Kumbhar and Ors.
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
